Fantom Farms

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Filter by risk
No data was found

Wealth Mountain uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 10% of the deposits/rewards go to the dev address.

  • ⚠️ RugDoc HIGHLY recommends thinking through all possible scenarios in these types of projects thoroughly and assessing your risk tolerance. DYOR.
  • ⚠️ Max of 10% early withdrawal fee, min of 2%.
  • ✅ Max 10% staking fees.
  • 3% referral.
  • ⚠️ Withdrawals and harvests will fail once the BUSD/USDC supply has been depleted.
  • ⚠️ Pending rewards will continue accumulating once BUSD/USDC supply is depleted, but none could be harvested

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here:

Posted on 27 September 2022 |

Custom Staking Contract

  • 🚨 Admin can drain funds at any time [see example code].
  • 🚨 Lock-in period can be extended indefinitely even for deposits already made.
  • ⚠️ It does not implement emergency withdrawals
  • Implements an individual contract for each pool.
Posted on 26 September 2022 |

Minimax is a multi-chain yield aggregator protocol. The project's approach is determining the platform with the highest returns and claims that users can rebalance their portfolio so that their funds are in the best yielding option. It also allows for users to set a stop-loss and take-profit on on their farming positions. Take note as well that the protocol's contracts are under a transparent upgradeable proxy which could literally update the implementation into any contract.

We reserve the right to not review complex projects that would require a great deal of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies. Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level. DYOR.

Posted on 06 September 2022 |

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 DO NOT DEPOSIT INTO THE GENESIS CONTRACT. ALL tokens deposited can be withdrawn by the project owner at anytime as the current poolEndTime is set to 31881600(Jan 1971)
  • ⚠️ No liquidity yet, therefore the genesis rewards cannot be sold
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 30 days after poolEndTime
  • Deposit Fee: 0.5%
  • ✅ Max 1% Deposit Fee
  • ✅ Does account for transfer-tax tokens
  • ✅ No Transfer Tax on Native Token
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • Genesis is running for 4 days

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xb018...bC1E)

Posted on 31 August 2022 |
Update
  • Website is down.
Updated on 16 August 2022

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 90 days after poolEndTime
  • ⚠️ Deposit Fee is uncapped
  • ✅ Genesis Operator renounced
  • ✅ Transfer Tax is capped at 10%
  • ✅ TaxOffice Ownership renounced (TransferTax is set to 0%)
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • Genesis is running for 1 day.

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x8206...e23B)

Posted on 16 August 2022 |

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

 

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 They had a RugDoc review badge on their page before review was online and they haven't removed it although we contacted them
  • 🚨 Transfer Tax of the Native Token can be set to 100% which would block all transfers
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ No liquidity yet, therefore the genesis rewards cannot be sold
  • ⚠️ Dev wallet has been funded through ShadeCash
  • ✅ Function governanceRecoverUnsupported removed
  • ✅ Genesis Operator renounced
  • ✅ Max 2% Deposit Fee
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • Deposit Fee: 2%
  • Genesis is running for 2 days

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xc53...084)

Posted on 09 August 2022 |

Goose fork

  • ✅ Max 4% deposit fees
  • ✅ All transfer-tax tokens are supported
  • ⚠️ Masterchef currently not behind a timelock
  • 10% of emissions sent to dev address
  • 50000 $POLO Max supply

⚠️ Triple check the contract you interact matches the one reviewed here (0x4077...ce48)

Posted on 04 August 2022 |

SPONSORED AD

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 Transfer Tax of the Native Token can be set to 100% which would block all transfers
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens.
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 30 days after poolEndTime
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • Genesis is running for 3 days
  • Deposit Fee: 0.5%

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x1d46...2F14)

Posted on 04 August 2022 |
Update

Update:

  • ✅ Audited by: Obelisk [link]
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • ✅ Token Owner = Treasury
Updated on 6 September 2022

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 Token Operator is a wallet which can mint & dump
  • 🚨 Token Ownership not renounced. Owner can mint & dump.
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens.
  • ⚠️ Existing pool deposit fees cannot be changed but new pools added have an uncapped deposit fee
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract reward tokens anytime
  • ✅ No Transfer Tax on Native Token, but there is a 10% sale tax
  • Genesis is running for 10 days

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x6d...139E)

Posted on 26 July 2022 |

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • ⚠️ No liquidity yet, therefore the genesis rewards cannot be sold
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 30 days after poolEndTime
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • ✅ Genesis Operator renounced
  • ✅ Max 1% Genesis Pool Deposit Fee
  • ✅ Transfer Tax is 0%
  • Genesis is running for 1 day
  • Note that Esse tokens are are largely concentrated with top 10 holders owning 54% of the supply, excluding contract addresses

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x53B7...32f3)

Posted on 10 July 2022 |
Update

UPDATE:

Seeing that in the project community, they seem to think or try to make it seem that the high risk is due to the use of Tornado (although it may be a valid reason in itself), the current reason is for having added the function in the Treasury to retrieve the operatorship [link] (which does not appear in the original version of Tomb Finance and has no valid reason for existing). Likewise, our reviews are not investment recommendations. ⚠️ Do your own risk assessment and act accordingly.

Updated on 29 June 2022

🚨 Project was funded via Tornado, which is historically associated with a higher chance of soft-rugging or switching contracts. Dev wallet has been founded through wallets that have been founded through Tornado in BSC [tx1 | tx2 | Tornado txs: txs1 | txs2]. In other chains, directly or indirectly, the initial funds have been transferred through bridges [ex: polygon tx | related tx (from BSC) || Fantom: tx1 | tx2 | tx3]. Additionally, they introduced a custom function to retrieve the operatorship of all tokens. Token Operator can mint & dump.🚨

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 90 days after poolEndTime
  • Deposit Fee: 1%
  • ✅ Max 1% Deposit Fee
  • ⚠️ Transfer Tax of the Native Token can be set to 100% which would block all transfers. ⚠️ See the warning at the beginning.
  • ⚠️ TaxOffice Ownership renounced ⚠️ See the warning at the beginning.
  • ⚠️ Token Ownership renounced. ⚠️ See the warning at the beginning.
  • ⚠️ Token Operator = Treasury. ⚠️ See the warning at the beginning. Operator can mint & dump.
  • Genesis is running for 1 day.

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x774dE5...F772). All chains share the same address.

Posted on 29 June 2022 |
Update

Update:

  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
Updated on 30 June 2022

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 Token Ownership not renounced. Owner can mint & dump.
  • ⚠️ 25% of genesis rewards are transferred to daoFund on each deposit and each withdrawal
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ Liquidity appears to be of small amount, genesis rewards can be sold but it may be accompanied with a big price impact.
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 90 days after poolEndTime
  • ✅ Genesis Operator renounced
  • ✅ No Genesis Pool Deposit Fee
  • ✅ TaxOffice renounced (Transfer Tax is currently set to 0%)
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • Genesis is running for 2 day

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x5186...aA3B)

Posted on 28 June 2022 |
Update
  • Website is down.
  • Discord has been deleted.
  • Twitter handle @cloverdefi has been deleted.
Updated on 30 June 2022

Goose Fork with a max supply of 10,000 CLOVER tokens

  • ⚠️ No initial liquidity has been added. Please clarify with the project on liquidity locking or burning.
  • ⚠️ Masterchef currently not behind a timelock.
  • ⚠️ Masterchef uses per-block emissions instead of per-time. This is an antipattern on the Avalanche network.
  • ⚠️ Does not support deflationary/transfer-tax token pools, just clarify with project that none will be added.
  • ⚠️ Withdrawals and harvests will fail once max supply is reached unless emissions and/or multipliers are set to zero. Users will still be able to emergency withdraw though.
  • ⚠️ Pending rewards will continue accumulating once max supply is reached, but none will actually be harvestable.
  • ✅ Token owner is MasterChef.
  • ✅ Max 4% deposit fees.
  • Dev and fee address can be set to the zero address, which would block regular withdrawals and harvests.
  • An extra 10% of emission rewards are minted to the dev address.

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0xb6D0...E9cb)

Posted on 25 June 2022 |

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ✅ 66% of PESTO-USDC SpookyLP tokens have been locked with RugDoc with an approximate amount of $60.
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

 

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ Liquidity appears to be of small amount, genesis rewards can be sold but it may be accompanied with a big price impact.
  • ✅ Genesis Operator renounced
  • ✅ Genesis Pool Max 1% Deposit Fee
  • ✅ TaxOffice renounced (Transfer Tax is currently set to 0%)
  • ✅ Token Transfer Tax is capped at 20%
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • Genesis is running for 1 day

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x05cA...E802)

Posted on 23 June 2022 |

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 30 days after poolEndTime
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ No liquidity yet, therefore the genesis rewards cannot be sold
  • ✅ Deposit Fee max 2%
  • ✅ No Transfer Tax on Native Token
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • Genesis is running for 3 days

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xDfde...6056)

Posted on 22 June 2022 |

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. From the same team as Batasm Finance. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 Deposit Fee is uncapped
  • ⚠️ Genesis contract allows you to deposit your tokens in the name of another user. This can be misused in the frontend, it is recommended to make a small deposit and check that everything is ok.
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ No liquidity yet, therefore the genesis rewards cannot be sold
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 90 days after poolEndTime
  • Deposit Fee: 1%
  • ✅ No Transfer Tax on Native Token
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • Genesis is running for 2 days

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xD720E9...23B4)

Posted on 22 June 2022 |

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 Token Ownership not renounced. Owner can mint & dump.
  • 🚨 Token Operator is a wallet which can mint & dump
  • 🚨 Transfer Tax of the Native Token can be set to 100% which would block all transfers
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ No liquidity yet, therefore the genesis rewards cannot be sold
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 90 days after poolEndTime
  • Deposit Fee: 1%
  • ✅ Max 1% Deposit Fee
  • Genesis is running for x days

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x9fd11F...8f08)

Posted on 18 June 2022 |

🚨 Already rugged. The project swapped the genesis contract to another [0xb1677e...e111] with a hard rug code inside. The stolen funds (~$490) were sent to Solana [tx].

🚨 The original contract [0x242569...7862] has a custom function that allows them to lock deposit funds up to any amount of time [link]. Unfortunately, this function has already been called and the deposited amounts are blocked for more than 30 days. The governanceRecoverUnsupported function of this contract can be called 30 days after the genesis stage has ended. Since this contract does not have an emergency withdrawal function, such funds (~3300$) can be considered virtually stolen.

Posted on 18 June 2022 |
Update

UPDATE 2:

Rugged. Socials and website down.

UPDATE:

  • Token ownership has been renounced [tx].
  • Token Operator == Treasury [tx].
Updated on 21 June 2022

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 Token Ownership not renounced. Owner can mint & dump.
  • 🚨 Token Operator is a wallet which can mint & dump
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ No liquidity yet, therefore the genesis rewards cannot be sold
  • ⚠️ Deposit Fee is uncapped
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 90 days after poolEndTime
  • ✅ No Transfer Tax on Native Token
  • Genesis is running for 2 days

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x3A8A...5bE3)

Posted on 15 June 2022 |

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review (Ended)

  • ✅ Genesis Operator renounced
  • Deposit Fee: 0%
  • ✅ Max 10% Deposit Fee
  • ✅ No Transfer Tax on Native Token
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operatorship renounced

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x50cbf8...0f9f)

Posted on 15 June 2022 |

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.