*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

IoTeX Farms

SPONSORED AD

Fantom
RugDoc KYC

SPONSORED AD

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Filter by risk

Goose fork

  • ✅ Max 4% deposit fees
  • ✅ All transfer-tax tokens are supported
  • ⚠️ Masterchef currently not behind a timelock
  • 10% of emissions sent to dev address

⚠️ Triple check the contract you interact matches the one reviewed here (0x1779...f774)

Posted on 18 October 2021 |

Uniswap V2 fork

  • As the project is an AMM that has its own router, it is highly advised to do a small swap transaction first to check that the router contract matches the one reviewed here.
  • With slight modification on the protocol fees from 0.05% to 0.03%, if enabled.
  • 0.3% Swap fees are the same with Uniswap V2.
  • Router has an added a referral mechanism where each swap records referral information.

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x95cB1888...07Fd8)

Posted on 13 October 2021 |

Goose fork

  • Explorer has no read capability and verifying the contract's owner, token, token owner, pools is not possible at the moment. Exercise extra care when staking or buying the token.
  • ✅ Max 4% deposit fees
  • ✅ All transfer-tax tokens are supported
  • 10% of emissions sent to dev address
  • Timelock (0x21...61DF) of MasterChef was linked by the team but we are unable to verify if ownership has been transferred due to block explorer limitations
  • Antiwhale present, unable to verify value set due to block explorer limitations.

⚠️ Triple check the contract you interact matches the one reviewed here (0x83e7...19b8)

Posted on 08 October 2021 |

Modified Goose fork

  • ⚠️ Transfer-tax liquidity tokens can be sent to the operator wallet. Please clarify with the project on how they plan to use this.
  • ⚠️ Token contract appears to have a custom swap feature where you can exchange the native network token for the project's token.
  • ⚠️ Project appears to be using its own router which seems to be a fork of Uniswap V2. Ensure that you perform a small test transaction first and check that the Router contract matches the one here.
  • ✅ Max 4% deposit fees
  • ✅ Masterchef behind a 12 hour timelock
  • ✅ Correctly accounts for transfer taxes on any token pool
  • Regular withdrawals will fail once max supply is reached unless emissions and/or multipliers are set to zero
  • 1/10th of emission rewards minted to dev address
  • 4.5% transfer tax (max 10%)
  • 0.5% anti-whale checks for token balance instead of transaction amount.
  • Harvest lockups of 12 hours

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x4DAB3...CF17C)

Posted on 07 October 2021 |

Goose fork

  • ✅ Max 4% deposit fees
  • ⚠️ Masterchef currently not behind a timelock
  • ⚠️ Does not support deflationary/transfer-tax token pools, just clarify with project that none will be added
  • Owner can modify start block but it will have no effect, just clarify with project that they will not try this
  • Dev address can be set to the zero address, which would block regular withdrawals and harvests
  • 1/10th of emission rewards minted to dev address.

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0xef897d43...f80d).

Posted on 07 October 2021 |

Magic Land Finance fork with a max supply of 1,000,000

  • ⚠️ Masterchef currently not behind a timelock
  • ✅ Correctly accounts for transfer taxes on any token pool
  • Max 4% withdrawal fees (including on emergencyWithdraw)
  • Regular withdrawals and harvests will fail once max supply is reached unless emissions and/or multipliers are set to zero
  • 10% of emission rewards minted to dev address
  • 10% of emission rewards are minted straight to the burn address

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0xe12b407f...0637)

Posted on 03 October 2021 |

Goose fork

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x92F1...56C17)

Posted on 30 September 2021 |

SPONSORED AD

Goose fork

  • ⚠️ Owner of token and Timelock cannot be verified due to limited explorer functionality
  • ✅ Max 4% deposit fees
  • 10% of emissions sent to dev address
  • 2% of emissions sent to burn address
  • ✅ All transfer-tax tokens are supported

⚠️ Triple check the contract you interact matches the one reviewed here (0x9B4C...b0c0)

Posted on 21 September 2021 |

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.