Polygon Farms

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Filter by risk
No data was found

Description

Lotus NFTs allow you to claim ETH and Polyn rewards. Lotus NFTs are also used to differentiate members within our community according to the amount of ETH they have staked with the platform.

Max Mintable / Minted (%) [At time of listing]

  • Unlimited

Mint Price

  • 1 ETH = 1 Petal
  • Wild Lotus = 8 Petals
  • Mystic Lotus = 16 Petals
  • Ethereal Lotus = 24 petals
  • Sacred Lotus = 32 petals

Launch Details

  • December 15, 2023 @ 11:59 PM UTC

Contract

  • Unknown

Reward Features

  • Lotus NFTs generate ETH and Polyn rewards.
  • Lotus NFTs achieve higher levels of conciousness,
    generate greater rewards, and automatically change according to their site.
Posted on 31 August 2023 |

Morpheus.Network TrustMNW appears to be a modified fork of Ring Financial where you have to create nodes using the native token. Proceeds from the node creation are then managed by the protocol to be invested into several DeFi platforms that will produce an optimal return as stated in their documentations. Each user who created nodes are then eligible to a certain reward per day as native tokens. So far, there seems to be no other fees to be noted aside from the reward claiming fee. (Nodes appear to be actual blockchain nodes that hold data according to their documentations)

  • ⚠️ Their platform is blocked by a sign in requirement and is not a decentralized platform.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as Not Eligible as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits as there is a risk of governance mishandling.

Posted on 01 August 2023 |

Tournament style game where users enter NFTs and other menbers can support their tribes with $Matic tokens to decide who moves onto the next round. Winner gets the prize pot of tokens that all users added.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as Not Eligible as we recommend these kind of projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 23 July 2023 |

Automated Uniswap V3 pool management to create short term trades similar to 'Dual Investment' feature in CEXs.

We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours.

Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level of complexity. DYOR.

Posted on 15 May 2023 |

🚨 Centralized application, user funds have to be deposited into a wallet which is controlled by the platform. Tokens can be withdrawn by the platform anytime. 🚨

Posted on 04 May 2023 |

Uliquid is a decentralized protocol that interfaces with major Lending protocols on Blockchains. It allows users to 'self liquidate' their positions on these protocols with flash loans to avoid losses from protocol liquidation or leverage their assets for more returns.

  • The Uliquid protocol currently charges a fee of 1% for liquidation
  • ⚠️ All contracts have not been verified on chain and can contain any implementation

Having listed the above features, we reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies. Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level of complexity. DYOR.

Posted on 15 March 2023 |

Lynxchain uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 10% of the deposits go to the dev address. Please note that these types of projects appear to be straight up ponzi schemes and you will lose money if you're not lucky enough to have more users come in after you so you can cash out. RugDoc highly recommends staying away from these types of projects. DYOR.

Posted on 05 March 2023 |

SPONSORED AD

Active liquidity provision vaults for Uniswap V3 protocol.

We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours.

Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level of complexity. DYOR

Posted on 28 February 2023 |

Yield vault for managing Uniswap V3 concentrated liquidity positions.

We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours.

Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level of complexity. DYOR

Posted on 27 February 2023 |

Purple Beans uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 3% of the deposits/rewards go to the dev address. Please note that these types of projects appear to be straight up ponzi schemes and you will lose money if you're not lucky enough to have more users come in after you so you can cash out. RugDoc highly recommends staying away from these types of projects. DYOR.

  • ⚠️ Withdrawals and harvests will fail once the MATIC supply has been depleted.
  • ⚠️ Pending rewards will continue accumulating once MATIC supply is depleted, but none could be harvested
  • ⚠️ Once deposited, users are unable to withdraw. They will have to work on harvesting rewards to cover the deposited amount.
  • ✅ Max 3% staking/harvest fees.
  • 5% referral.
  • Minimum deposit amount of 10 MATIC.
  • Daily reward limit of 10,000 MATIC.
  • Has a maximum payout amount of 3 times the deposited amount.

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x1b9F...56C0)

Posted on 02 February 2023 |

HoudiniSwap is a project that claims to allow trading between multiple assets and multiple chains, using the Monero blockchain as an intermediary to provide a layer of anonymity. The functionality is similar to FixeFloat or similar services, in the sense that no smart contracts are used, instead the deposit by the user is made to a wallet controlled by the project, which then sends.

  • ⚠️ RugDoc HIGHLY recommends thinking through all possible scenarios in these types of projects thoroughly and assessing your risk tolerance. DYOR.
  • They have their own Token ($POOF: 0x888c...f57a), which is only found on the ETH chain:
    • ⚠️ Transfer can be blocked anytime by blacklisting
    • Initial liquidity locked until Feb 18, 2023 (see tx)
    • Max Supply: 100,000 tokens
    • PreMinted: 100%
    • Taxes: Buy 6% | Sell 6% | Transfer 2%
    • Other Significant Governance Privileges: owner can take out any token from the contract (unless it is the token itself), enable trading once, change all fee receiving addresses and change the ratio's at which these addresses receive fees.
Posted on 24 January 2023 |

PCS router and factory fork

Liquid Bolt Finance uses modified versions of the liquidity pair, factory, and router contracts. Said functionalities are used to grant rewards obtained through arbitrage produced in the event of a mismatch between the values of the assets.

The changes made are focused on swap rates, limitations on the execution of certain functionalities, etc. Docs indicates that the yield is obtained through arbitrage when using their software. At no time is it indicated who or who would be the users of this software, what type of software it is, or what the flow of earnings would be like.

Anyway, some things that may be of interest to you:

  • 20% DevFee in swaps. ⚠️ It can be up to 50%
  • ⚠️ Mint, Swap and Skim functions can be restricted for use by authorized users only. Burn function is free of restrictions, so it could break liquidity at any time without problems.
  • Each liquidity pair can have a custom fee.

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here:

Posted on 09 December 2022 |

🚨🚨🚨 Uses an upgradeable proxy for all contracts, so it can swap out contracts to literally anything 🚨🚨🚨

Posted on 09 December 2022 |
Update

UPDATE 2:

  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • ✅ Transfer tax: 15% (fixed)

UPDATE 1:

The project has asked us for a re-review of the project, having finished the genesis stage. So, taking into account that the risk was in the use of the genesis contract, we proceed to review the rest of the things that commonly make up a review of a Tomb fork.

  • ⚠️ Not KYC’d with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.
  • 🚨 Transfer Tax of the Native Token can be set to 100% which would block all transfers
  • 🚨 Token Ownership not renounced. Owner can mint & dump.
  • 🚨 Token Operator = Treasury. But the owner can set the operator back to himself.

High Risk assessment is maintained

Updated on 25 February 2023

🚨 Owner can drain the contract abusing a discrepancy in the calculation and deduction of the deposit fee at any time. If you have already deposited, withdraw through emergency withdrawal function 🚨

Posted on 06 December 2022 |

Lucky Numbers is a betting platform where the user can purchase lottery tickets and can indicate the numbers for which the user bets.

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible]. Furthermore, the protocol will launch its native tokens using the Tomb Finance methodology. The current review is carried out on the latter.

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date. They have an audit done by StaySafu. On the StaySafu page [link] it indicates that there are 1 Critical, 4 Major, 7 Medium, 14 Minor and 1 Informational issues but in the report they only indicate 1 Medium, 5 Minor and 1 informational [link].
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 Token Ownership not renounced. Owner can mint & dump.
  • 🚨 Token Operator is a wallet which can mint & dump
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ No liquidity yet, therefore the genesis rewards cannot be sold
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 90 days after poolEndTime
  • ✅ Max 1% Deposit Fee
  • ✅ No Transfer Tax on Native Token
  • Genesis is running for 3 days

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x75fb17...c191)

Posted on 13 November 2022 |

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 Token Ownership not renounced. Owner can mint & dump
  • ⚠️ Operator is able to withdraw all $Space tokens stored in the contract with the Migrate function
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 90 days after poolEndTime
  • ✅ No Transfer Tax on Native Token
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • ✅ Max 4% Deposit Fee
  • Genesis is running for 365 days

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x5DBF...d502)

Posted on 01 November 2022 |

Goose fork

  • ✅ Max 3% deposit fees
  • ⚠️ Masterchef currently not behind a timelock
  • ✅ Correctly accounts for transfer taxes on any token pool
  • An extra 10% of emission rewards are minted to the dev address
  • ⚠️ Masterchef has not been excluded from anti-whale which could block harvests.
  • 6.66% transfer tax (max 10%)
  • anti-whale disabled (min 5%)

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x8cC371...ab6)

Posted on 31 October 2022 |
Update

Rugged. Website down. They drained the Bonus contract (0x3d99ae...3de2) after only 3 hours of implementing and launching it [tx1 | tx2]. The stolen funds (~$24.7k) have been transferred to a wallet that appears to belong to an exchange [txs | txs2 | 0xf89d7b...aa40]

⚠️ Bonus contract was not part of the first review. Always remember to verify that the contract is clean before investing.

Updated on 18 October 2022

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • ⚠️ No liquidity yet, therefore the genesis rewards cannot be sold
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • ✅ Max 1% Deposit Fee
  • ✅ No Transfer Tax on Native Token
  • ✅ Function governanceRecoverUnsupported removed
  • Genesis is running for 2 days

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xf1cE...fd7d5)

Posted on 10 October 2022 |

Jarvis Network deals with overcollateralized stablecoins and synthetic fiat currencies in multiple chains. We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours.

Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level of complexity. DYOR.

Posted on 08 October 2022 |

Wealth Mountain uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 10% of the deposits/rewards go to the dev address.

  • ⚠️ RugDoc HIGHLY recommends thinking through all possible scenarios in these types of projects thoroughly and assessing your risk tolerance. DYOR.
  • ⚠️ Max of 10% early withdrawal fee, min of 2%.
  • ✅ Max 10% staking fees.
  • 3% referral.
  • ⚠️ Withdrawals and harvests will fail once the BUSD/USDC supply has been depleted.
  • ⚠️ Pending rewards will continue accumulating once BUSD/USDC supply is depleted, but none could be harvested

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here:

Posted on 27 September 2022 |

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.