Yield Farm Tokenomics 101, by Blizzard.Money

What is the difference between inflationary, deflationary, and utility tokenomics? Knowing this answer might make or break your next yield farm.

A crypto asset or coin can be inflationary or deflationary.

Inflationary Tokenomics

In inflationary tokenomics, this means that your token has no maximum supply, and emits at a steady amount per block. Proof of stake coins come with certain inflation baked in (5-15% is a common observation) so that validators and delegators can be incentivized.

Coins like Polkadot dynamically adjust inflation based on staking and participation so that the security of the network can be maintained.

Many DeFi tokens also use inflation to reward liquidity providers and yield farmers on their specific protocols; they have very aggressive inflation schedules to maintain higher annual percentage yields.

However, too much inflation can reduce the value of these coins or tokens already in circulation unless the inflation schedule is extremely aggressive it will not impact short-term prices. 

 $CAKE is a great example of inflationary tokenomics in DeFi. The inflation keeps your APRs high, but requires careful control to make sure the supply doesn’t get out of hand.

You’ll likely need to manually handle burns (sending tokens to the 0xdead address), or develop some unique method to help manage the supply such as extinction pools from DinoSwap. 

While I would label inflationary mechanics as the most common tokenomics method we see in DeFi and especially yield farming, it is also the most advanced.

You need a calculated and active team that is ready to make tough decisions at any time in order to maximize the upside to this method. This method is recommended if you also intend to host many other farms on your platform, as you need higher emissions to do this.

Deflationary Tokenomics

In deflationary tokenomics, your token has a maximum supply, reduced token emissions over time, or both!

A deflationary design of a coin creates a reduction of supply over time, creating a shortage of supply, scarcity value, and hence price increase. Deflationary assets also do not drastically alter the price in the short term and the demand drives longer-term exponential increases.

Deflation of highly adopted crypto assets can make them very valuable e.g., Bitcoin has a total supply of 21 million, with BTC created per block cut in half every four years.

However, at a token and not commodity scale, deflationary mechanics can sometimes be harmful if not executed properly.

For example, if your emissions reduce too much before your farm really gets going, it can negatively affect the APRs and turn off potential new investors who prefer only the most degen of farms. To maximize the upside with this method, try starting with a large, maximum supply, but burn some tokens manually from your developer/team allocation as a first line of defense instead of reducing the emissions should the price go down too quickly.

Deflationary tokenomics is a great overall strategy, and can lend itself to those looking for a more long-term project that don’t intend to have as many pools as PancakeSwap for example.  This strategy is recommended should you intend to build on top of your farm with additional strategies such as vaults, stableswaps, or other unique features.

Utility Tokenomics

The last method to consider with your farm is utility tokenomics. This means that your token has a clear use case outside of being sold for yield.

For example, if your token is used to earn $KEYS which unlock chests containing NFTs for your play to earn game. If you decide you want to add vaults and become an aggregator, your token may be used for governance and pay a dividend (like $BIFI). In this instance, you’d want to consider a mix of both deflationary and inflationary measures that best compliment your goals.

If you pay a dividend for example, perhaps you’d want to consider reducing the supply over time, so that each holder’s share of the dividend becomes larger. If you want a large governance model that decides which vaults are added, perhaps you do want an infinite supply.

All said and done you’ll want to first decide exactly what you intend to do with your farm, and let that dictate the direction of your tokenomics.

Using a mix of these tactics that fit your needs exactly will offer the best results both early on and once you are more established. No matter what you decide, always listen to the feedback of your community and investors to help guide your decision making process.


🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.