Underrated Predictors of Yield Farm Success, by Sugandese Tokens

What goes into a yield farm's success? The money? The investors? Of course - but what about the lesser known predictors?

Greetings! My name is Benjamin Rich, and yes, I do have a PhD in scientific coding, but I now publish in the field of shitfarming.

I’d like to discuss what what I believe are a series of underrated factors that underlie the quality of yield farm outcomes and largely determine their level of success:

Total Native Liquidity (TNL)

This is the sum of the value stored in all native LP pairs.

This value is important because it represents the native token’s resistance to price movement. Further, unless there are multiple native tokens, TNL is equal to double the amount of “real coins” that investors can get out of a farm, colloquially referred to as the amount of “blood in the pig.”

This value can facilitate calculations about things such as the advisability of depositing, but it is rarely displayed, as TNL is not the amount staked but the entire amount of native liquidity in existence.


This is the ratio of TNL to TVL (total value locked), which is one of the most reliable indicators of farm health. This ratio represents the relationship between how much value can be extracted from the farm and how much value is pursuing that extraction.

This can be a useful indicator of future total returns assuming no further deposits. However, this ratio is essentially never shown in any farm’s data display; the farthest anybody gets is displaying both TVL and TNL next to each other.

Supply expansion (%/day)

This is the number of tokens that a farm mints in any 24-hour period as a percentage of the supply at the beginning of that 24-hour period. This statistic measures how much “dump pressure” there is on the ecosystem and is a key indicator of future token price.

Multiplying this percentage by the current market cap gives the amount of buy support that will have to come into the ecosystem in order for the token to maintain price for the 24-hour period in question. 

Most farms do not display this information because it is simply too unfavorable for them, as the majority of farms expand their supplies far too rapidly. Displaying numbers like 21,600,000% supply expansion per day would make it obvious that many farms are not sustainable.

Too many coins minted relative to the existing supply harms native stakers and liquidity providers because of the inevitability of token price drop. 

There are two main reasons why farm operators continue to emit too many tokens relative to the supply.

The first is simple ignorance: many farm operators do not realize the mathematics of the situation. We can do something about that, but we cannot do anything about the second reason: greed.

The example above shows how easy it is to rig things so that the farm appears to be producing $10,000+ per block. This encourages deposits by naive investors because the displayed APRs in such situations are incredibly high. However, the returns will quickly disappear if the supply expands by 5 times its size in the first block. Sorry to disappoint you.

Liquidity Provided

The amount of team liquidity provided is a key contributor to a farm’s survival. Obviously, it reflects the amount of money available to buffer against token price movements or for investors to extract. If locked or burned, it can also represent a team’s financial commitment to the project.

But it also represents another hidden factor: the amount of team liquidity provided is negatively related to the scamminess of its launch. So-called “fair launches” that are rigged for insiders often start out with a suspiciously low amount of team-provided liquidity, followed by equally suspicious bot buys in the few blocks after launch.

This leads to a situation where the person who placed the bot buys gets to make money at the expense of all other participants. Providing team liquidity at fair value prevents this from occurring.

Accessible Treasury

This is the amount of money the project has available. I know it’s not exactly “fair to the little guys,” but the amount a team is willing to spend on a project signals both commitment and ability to accomplish goals.

If we are prospectively analyzing a team’s propensity to “rug pull” i.e. exit scam, money dedicated to the project is an obvious indicator of persistence. This is why the RugDoc KYC service is among the best values in the business: it provides a permanent signal of not only commitment to the project, but also financial outlay.

Founder’s Years in Crypto

Seniority matters. A person’s likelihood of having good ideas is directly affected by their experience level. The ability to contextualize the current experiences of the yield farming industry in historical terms can impart the wisdom necessary to respond to situations.

The ability to grasp onto sources of appeal to major investors is extremely important. A founder who has an extremely high level of seniority might even have personal connections with people who can command large investments or have even bigger friends of their own.

The founder having an existing personal network in crypto (most commonly through another farm) is a very strong predictor of farm success.

Token Sink

A token sink is something else for tokens to do or a place for them to go other than being dumped.

It can be the answer to everything: “Who created the tokens?,” “What do the tokens do?,” “Where do the tokens go?,” “When do I get to deposit the tokens?,” and “Why must I put them there?.”

Leper colonies of farms joining hands and opening pools for each other’s tokens is the most common manifestation of a token sink. That does help, but a more effective sink than the pools those farms can usually get is usually necessary for a farm to last more than a few weeks, as mutual pools do not help when the farms that offer them die.

The presence and viability of a token sink is almost the be-all-end-all of longer-term farm viability, as without a designated purpose, the entire point of the farm amongst informed participants is to dump for as many “real coins” as possible in a cynical race to the exits.

The Live-Action Roleplay (LARP) Factor

LARPers are those people who dress up and talk in Belvedere Castle accents while whacking each other with cardboard swords.

So what do LARPers and yield farm operators have in common? They both pretend to be something they are not. Many yield farms pretend to have a token sink or other mechanism that will make them sustainable, when in fact, most of these “LARPs” are either complete lies or recycled old canards that don’t really work.

The LARPs that have been complete lies are pretty straightforward to understand: some farm creators have actually done extremely well by promising things that they never deliver.

The promise of fake things to come simply makes people hold the coins, creating a sink that is more effective than many real things. The recycled old canards are somewhat more difficult to dissect.

The idea of a centralized “dividend pool” being added to a farm is the most common type of concrete LARP attempt, but such pools usually require 100% principal risk while holding a single inflationary token.

Further, most so-called dividend pools merely drip out a relatively small amount of money from a pile controlled by a centralized entity. This is not exactly in accordance with the “spirit of decentralization” that blockchain technology espouses, and the arrows of money always point from plebs to token creators in such arrangements (thus the description of the claim to offer dividends as a LARP).

Ultimately, because very few farms actually have any innovative ideas, a farm’s ability to LARP effectively can be a key determinant of success.

In the end, a yield farm can emit four tokens and call them “fire,” “earth,” “water,” and “air,” but if people don’t want them for any particular reason, they are all actually “shit.”

We have to be realistic and admit that LARPing is most farms’ only way of making people want the tokens. In fact, I would call the LARP factor the most underrated factor in yield farm evaluation, as success in this area can singlehandedly and drastically extend a farm’s lifespan. So, yield farm runners are well advised to put tinfoil on their best piece of cardboard and get to LARPing as hard as they can!

Thanks for reading through my list of underrated predictors of yield farm success. I hope that these insights lead to successful shitcoining by all!

Many cheers and best regards,



🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.