Filter by network
Filter by risk
*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.
Fork of OlympusDAO:
Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
Fork of OlympusDAO:
Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
OlympusDAO fork token that rewards users for walking. Remember that OlympusDAO forks have unsustainable tokenomics with extremely high APY coming from extremely high inflation rates
⚠️ Triple check the contract you interact matches the one reviewed here (0x111...7Bb)
⚠️ Triple check the contract you interact matches the one reviewed here (0xce2...68b)
Rebase token with incredibly high APY% similar to OHM, STASH, etc. with added reflection logic. These tokens have proven to be unsustainable in the long run due to very high levels of inflation. Invest with caution.
⚠️ Triple check the contract you interact matches the one reviewed here (0x1a5...e17)
Another high (409,494.5%) APY promising rebase token build on AVAX. Fork of OHM/TIME/TOMB. Extremely high APY is not coming from utility but rather from hyper-inflation and new people buying in. These projects have proven to be unsustainable please DYOR.
⚠️ Triple check the contract you interact matches the one reviewed here (0x536...9e7)
Fork of OlympusDAO:
Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
Fork of OlympusDAO:
Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
Fork of OlympusDAO, mechanics are similar to MiniPanther:
Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling.
Developer team well known and established. Previous projects include MiniPanther DAO, Poly Wants a Cracker, Stone Temple, Stadium Arcadium. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
Fork of OlympusDAO:
Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
RugDoc KYC: Project owner has KYC’d to us, and has signalled his transparency and commitment to this project. We have also confirmed that the project owner has access to the privileged addresses of the project, and shall retain full responsibility over them and any actions taken by them.
Modified Panther fork Masterchef
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0xB8CD...c1Ba)
Fork of OlympusDAO:
Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
Fork of OlympusDAO:
Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
✅ Liquidity has been locked with RugDoc Txn Hash: BEGO-DAI
✅ Multisig - None of the members have performed KYC with RugDoc. We strongly encourage all members to KYC.
Fork of OlympusDAO:
Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
Fork of OlympusDAO with mechanics similar to SnowDog:
Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
🚨 Provided false information during KYC and linked to the same owners behind FarmersDAO. Risk Rating has been increased to High Risk.
Fork of OlympusDAO:
Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
Fork of OlympusDAO:
Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
Fork of OlympusDAO:
Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
TeaDAO appears to be an OlympusDAO fork that is in the Binance Smart Chain. The platform will follow a very complex system which involves multiple interconnected smart contracts that aim to build its reserve thru its platform profits to give its native token an intrinsic value that can support its unique approach on being an algorithmic reserve currency backed by decentralized assets.
OlympusDAO forks usually offer two options for users on its platform: Staking — the platform allows you to deposit the native token where it gives out a token receipt that recalculates on every certain period (rebase) for your percentage share of native tokens in the pool which were collected from the platform fees and reward rates; and Bonding — lend your LP tokens to the platform to gain discounted native tokens that is vested over a certain period. This method allows the platform to gain revenue from LP rewards to further reinforce its reserves and ensure exit liquidity.
Fork of OlympusDAO:
We are classifying this as [Some Risk] and will consider lowering the rating to [Low Risk] once the project has passed a reputable audit. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
Fork of OlympusDAO:
We are classifying this as [Some Risk] and will consider lowering the risk to [Low Risk] once the project has passed a reputable audit. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
Disclaimer: This is done with our best knowledge and effort, nothing can be known for certain – always DYOR and risk management. This is NOT financial advice. Use the information presented here to inform your own decisions. Referral links may be included on any outbound link.
🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:
1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.
2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.
3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.
Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.
This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.
A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.
Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.
Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.
Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.
🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.
🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.
⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.
🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.
🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!
⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.