OHM Fork

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Filter by network
Filter by risk
No data was found

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ Contracts have not been connected to the website
  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 08 May 2022 |

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ Contracts have not been connected to the website
  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 24 March 2022 |

Fork of OlympusDAO, mechanics are similar to MiniPanther:

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling.

Developer team well known and established. Previous projects include MiniPanther DAO, Poly Wants a Cracker, Stone Temple, Stadium Arcadium. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 19 March 2022 |

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.
  • ⚠️ Liquidity will be added after the presale ends. Presales are notoriously risky, DYOR. Please clarify with the project on liquidity locking/burning once it is added.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 15 March 2022 |

RugDoc KYC: Project owner has KYC’d to us, and has signalled his transparency and commitment to this project. We have also confirmed that the project owner has access to the privileged addresses of the project, and shall retain full responsibility over them and any actions taken by them.

Modified Panther fork Masterchef

  • Assent Protocol appears to be offering a multitude of products, however, only the Masterchef, Token, and AMM is covered on this review.
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not yet provided as the protocol is in presale stage. Please clarify with the project on liquidity locking or burning
  • ⚠️ Addresses with minter roles can mint tokens, addresses with pauser roles can pause token transfers, and addresses with rescuer roles can retrieve tokens from the token contract.
  • ✅ Max 5% deposit fee / Max 1% harvest fee
  • ✅ Masterchef behind a 24 hr timelock
  • ✅ Correctly accounts for transfer taxes on any token pool
  • The protocol uses a modified router and factory from UniswapV2 which allows modification of the swap fee.
  • The protocol introduces a custom computation for rate reductions aimed for their early investors. Maximum reduction is up to 80% of the fees.
  • An extra 10% of emission rewards are minted to the dev address, if enabled
  • 1% referral
  • Harvest lockups (max 5 days)

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0xB8CD...c1Ba)

Posted on 13 March 2022 |

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 28 February 2022 |

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 22 February 2022 |

SPONSORED AD

Update

✅ Liquidity has been locked with RugDoc Txn Hash: BEGO-DAI
✅ Multisig - None of the members have performed KYC with RugDoc. We strongly encourage all members to KYC.

Updated on 11 March 2022

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 19 February 2022 |

Fork of OlympusDAO with mechanics similar to SnowDog:

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 09 February 2022 |
Update

🚨 Provided false information during KYC and linked to the same owners behind FarmersDAO. Risk Rating has been increased to High Risk.

Updated on 6 February 2022

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ✅ Uses a Custom Multisig with 2 owners. We highly recommend the project to have one community member or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk and we strongly encourage all members to KYC.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 04 February 2022 |

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 26 January 2022 |

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 26 January 2022 |
Update

TeaDAO appears to be an OlympusDAO fork that is in the Binance Smart Chain. The platform will follow a very complex system which involves multiple interconnected smart contracts that aim to build its reserve thru its platform profits to give its native token an intrinsic value that can support its unique approach on being an algorithmic reserve currency backed by decentralized assets.

OlympusDAO forks usually offer two options for users on its platform: Staking — the platform allows you to deposit the native token where it gives out a token receipt that recalculates on every certain period (rebase) for your percentage share of native tokens in the pool which were collected from the platform fees and reward rates; and Bonding — lend your LP tokens to the platform to gain discounted native tokens that is vested over a certain period. This method allows the platform to gain revenue from LP rewards to further reinforce its reserves and ensure exit liquidity.

Updated on 22 January 2022

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ✅ KYC'd with RugDoc - 1 out of 3 owners have KYC'd with RugDoc but we strongly encourage all remaining members to KYC.
  • ✅ Multisig

We are classifying this as [Some Risk] and will consider lowering the rating to [Low Risk] once the project has passed a reputable audit. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 22 January 2022 |

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ✅ KYC'd with RugDoc - 1 out of 2 have KYC'd with RugDoc but we strongly encourage all remaining members to KYC.
  • ✅ Multisig

We are classifying this as [Some Risk] and will consider lowering the risk to [Low Risk] once the project has passed a reputable audit. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 19 January 2022 |

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 17 January 2022 |

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 15 January 2022 |

An upcoming OHM-Fork on the Binance Smart Chain.

They already did their whitelist presale and distributed their Presale Token (0x3e6D7ac44A0ac8a99B0D8248Fc6e9e5F5a98CFb6)

Currently we are waiting for them to deploy their main contracts and the review will be adapted therefore.

- ✅ Kyc
- ✅ Multi sig
- ⚠ No proper audit yet

This review will get the 'low risk' rating once they:
a) deployed their main contracts
b) got a proper audit from Paladin or another t1 auditor

Posted on 11 January 2022 |

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ✅ Multisig - Total of 4 members in their multisig contract, 2 of which are third party members. With 3 out of 4 approvals needed to execute a transaction.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as [Not Eligible] as we recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 10 January 2022 |

Minotaur Money is a fork of OlympusDAO. The platform follows a very complex system which involves multiple interconnected smart contracts that aim to build its reserve thru its platform profits to give its native token an intrinsic value that can support its unique approach on being an algorithmic reserve currency backed by decentralized assets.

Minotaur Money offers two options for users on its platform: Staking -- the platform allows you to deposit the native token where it gives out a token receipt that recalculates on every certain period (rebase) for your percentage share of MINO tokens in the pool which were collected from the platform fees and reward rates; and Bonding -- lend your LP tokens to the platform to gain discounted native tokens that is vested over a certain period. This method allows the platform to gain revenue from LP rewards to further reinforce its reserves and ensure exit liquidity.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as Not Eligible as we recommend these kind of projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 09 January 2022 |

Fork of OlympusDAO:

  • 🚨 Please be informed that the project has not reached out to RugDoc as of date, and any claims that the RugDoc team is part of a multisig is false.
  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date.
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc

We are classifying the project as [High Risk] as it is has not passed reputable audits, KYC verifications, and until the above points have been resolved. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks as OlympusDAO forks are prone to governance mishandling.

Posted on 06 January 2022 |

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.