*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Timeleap Finance

Polygon

RugDoc Review

Some Risk
UPDATE

Update 5: The risk rating has been upgraded to Some Risk, as a one-off discretionary decision based upon the transparency that the project has shown to its community, as well as having 2 Paladin audits (Even though 1 of them is purely Acknowledged). It does, however, signal dedication and willingness of the owner(s) to commit to their project.

Update 4: Paladin audit of vaults completed. Click on “More Info” to find the link to the audit.

UPDATE 3: They have deployed a safeOwner contract, which limits deposit fees to only 4%. Additionally, they are also currently undergoing an audit for their vaults by Paladin, a RugDoc preferred auditor for their focus on user safety. Once the audits have completed, we will update this review accordingly.

UPATE 2:

  • ✅ Masterchef now behind a 24 hour timelock

UPDATE

  • Project confirms they are aware that their Masterchef doesn’t support tokens with transfer taxes and pledges to not add them as pools.
  • DFYN, SUSHI and AAVE pools have been added to the website.

PolyCat fork with no referral and a capped supply (86,400 tokens)

  • ⚠️ Pools on the masterchef don’t currently match the site. There’s no SUSHI, DFYN or AAVE pools. TRIPLE CHECK the contract matches 0x41C4dFA3…1306.
  • 100% deposit fees possible  Deposit fees are now capped to 4% by the SafeOwner contract
  •  Masterchef behind a 3 hour timelock SafeOwner contract is behind a 1 day Timelock
  • ⚠️ Does not support deflationary/transfer-tax token pools, just clarify with project that none will be added
  • Withdrawals/deposits might fail when the max supply is reached, unless the masterchef owner manually calls finalMint()
  • 1/10th of emission rewards minted to dev address
  • Has entered an official partnership with JetSwap
  • Paladin audit on vaults

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x41C4dFA3…1306)

Updated on 8 September 2021

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Links

Related Events

No related events

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.