*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

How to verify if a Farm uses an Anti-Whale Function (Arbitrum)

In this article we explain how you can verify if a farm has an anti-whale function. This extra layer of protection prevents pump and dumps by limiting the number of tokens to be purchased and sold per transaction.

Step 1. Find the MasterChef contract address

First, we need to find the MasterChef contract address. In this example we’ll use ArbiKiwi’s MasterChef contract.

You can find a farm’s MasterChef contract address either by looking at our reviewed farms list on our website rugdoc.io or by looking on the documents page of a farm. This guide explains how to find MasterChef contracts in more detail.

Step 2. Open the MasterChef contract

Now that you have found the MasterChef contract address, open the Arbitrum block explorer and paste the MasterChef contract address in the search bar and hit enter.

Step 3. Search for the anti-whale function

Once you have opened the MasterChef contract, select the ‘Contract’ tab and then select ‘Code’.

Look for the section called ‘Contract Source Code’. Click inside the code box and press Ctrl+f. To find the anti-whale function, use one of the following keywords: ‘Whale’, ‘Anti’ or ‘maxtransferamount’.

You can conclude from the coding below that in ArbiKiwi’s case, there’s a 100% anti-whale function present. This means that the anti-whale function is enabled, but it there are no restriction to the number of tokens that can be swapped.

// Max transfer amount rate in basis points. Eg: 50 - 0.5% of total supply (default the anti whale feature is turned off - set to 10000.)
uint16 public maxTransferAmountRate = 10000;
// The operator can only update the Anti Whale Settings
address private _operator;
Updated on January 2, 2022
How do you feel about this article?
 

Leave a Reply

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package - please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.