*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Introducing Curve Finance

Table of Contents

Curve Finance is a decentralized cryptocurrency exchange (DEX) like Uniswap. Uniswap allows you to swap any ERC-20 token (provided there is liquidity), while Curve allows you to trade ERC-20 stablecoins on the Ethereum blockchain.

In this article, we will take a more in depth approach to discuss what it’s like to stake with stablecoins and how it compares to other DeFi protocols.

Curve Finance #

The sudden release of Curve v2 brought a lot of attention to Curve Finance. The protocol traditionally specializes in stablecoin pools of like-kind. In v2, they announced an advanced new algorithm for pooling assets of different price points.

The DeFi ecosystem has grown around Curve. The trop three Ethereum-based protocols that are in a three-way race for top volumes are Curve, Uniswap and Sushiswap. As of writing, Curve is in the lead with about $10 billion. Sushiswap claims just under $5B, while Uniswap claims $7B.

Unlike Uniswap and Sushiswap, Curve’s purpose is to minimize price slippage. The (local) price of coins change when large quantities of coins are removed from liquidity pools, which causes the pool to become unbalanced. In the months leading up to the launch of version 2, Curve took two main approaches to this problem:

  1. Primarily focusing on like-kind pools (dollarcoin to dollarcoin), which have a lower price sensitivity.
  2. In its white paper, Curve describes how its Stableswap Invariant reduces slippage while maintaining asymptotic behavior at extreme values along with two constant-sum invariants and a constant-product invariant:
(Images found on Curve Finance White Paper)

Indeed, on a typical trade, slippage is very low on Curve, as low as 6 basis points relative to Uniswap’s 80.

Curve Pools #

Curve currently provides stablecoin pools denominated in Dollars, Euros, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Chainlink, with more denominations in the pipeline. As of mid 2021, Curve tends to see hundreds of millions of dollars in trading volume each day in these pools.

(Curve Finance StableCoin Pools)

Liquidity providers have invested about 10 billion dollars in Curve’s stablecoin pools, which ranges from Ethereum to Polygon and Fantom. They receive a portion of trading fees as well as reward gauges offered by some pools. The native governance token, $CRV, is also available in most pools.

The main benefit of $CRV is that it can be locked for veCRV, which guarantees owners an even greater share of trading fees. veCRV owners can also vote on Curve governance issues, such as boosting liquidity provider rewards within some pools. Additionally, Yearn and Convex are locked into what some refer to as the “Curve Wars” and rely heavily on veCRV boosts to generate yield.

However, there is more to Curve than just making money.

Curve’s stable and secure liquidity pools have enabled an entire ecosystem of DeFi products and services to be built on Curve’s platform. Through Curve’s pool factory, users can create their own pools using Curve’s infrastructure.

On many DeFi sites, users are able to make transactions and earn yield on coins by directly connecting to Curve pools.

Curve relied on Synthetix before version 2 (v2) to facilitate cross-asset swaps between any denomination of Curve pools. For example, large exchanges between dollars and bitcoin can be conducted with very little slippage. At the time of this writing, nearly a billion dollars in cross asset swaps had been completed.

Let’s expect to see a volume of cross-asset swaps directly through pools containing different currencies after the release of Curve v2. It appears that the TriCrypto pool, which includes dollarcoins, Ethereum, and Bitcoin, is the first of several pools that will allow direct trading.

References:

Updated on February 6, 2022
How do you feel about this article?

Leave a Reply

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package - please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.