*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Introduction To BENQI Finance

Lending protocols can be very useful on their own but it seems that BENQI went a step further and on top of the lending services it also offers liquid staking, a service that was mostly only available on Ethereum before BENQI introduced it on Avalanche as well.

Let’s take a closer look and see how BENQI can help you manage your crypto assets on Avax more efficiently.

What Is BENQI? #

BENQI is a lending protocol on Avalanche which offers two main services to its users:

  • BENQI Liquidity Market
  • BENQI Liquid Staking

The liquidity market offers lending services that use the same dynamics as any other lending protocol like AAVE. Users can either lend their assets to others or take out loans based on their collateral.

At the time of writing, BENQI rewards both parties with extra rewards that come in the form of QI and AVAX tokens.

Liquid staking is currently only available for AVAX and the service is very straightforward. Deposited AVAX tokens are staked on the network by the protocol whie the depositor gets sAVAX tokens in exchange. These tokens still earn staking rewards but they are also liquid meaning that they can be sold in the market.

This feature removes the need for locking up tokens and gives users more flexibility when dealing with long term investments. Ethereum users may find many similarities between BENQI and Convex Finance since they are basically using the same liquid staking model.

What Is The QI Token? #

As already mentioned, QI is the governance token of the BENQI platform giving voting rights to holders. The token a maximum supply of 7,200,000,000 and is distributed as follows:

  • Liquidity Mining Program – 3,240,000,000 (45%)
  • Token Sale – 1,800,000,000 (25%)
  • Treasury – 1,080,000,000 (15%)
  • Team – 720,000,000 (10%)
  • Exchange Liquidity – 360,000,000 (5%)

The long-term goal behind the QI token is to turn the whole BENQI ecosystem into a DAO where users would vote on improvements and retain voting rights for any future iteration of the protocol and ecosystem.

Risks Involved #

As with every DeFi protocol, using BENQI comes with certain risks. The most obvious ones are probably smart contracts which are audited but users can never get a 100% guarantee that they are exploit-free.

Other risks include financial responsibility and if you understand how lending protocols work these risks will be significantly lower. Liquidation thresholds depend on the asset you are using as collateral so be sure that you are always aware of your risk management.

Conclusion #

BENQI has proved that it can be so much more than a simple lending protocol. Liquid staking opens up a lot of different possibilities for crypto investors on Avalanche allowing them to have much more flexibility with staked assets which would otherwise be inaccessible until the staking period is over.

With proper risk management BENQI can surely be a great tool for both long-term and short-term token holders.

Updated on July 12, 2022
How do you feel about this article?
 

Leave a Reply

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package - please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.