*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Introduction To Optimism

Ethereum has been in dire need for scaling solutions throughout 2021 but some of them are slowly starting to become a reality and Optimism is one of them. During last year funds have slowly started pouring into Optimism eventually hitting an ATH of roughly $500M in bridged funds.

What Is Optimism? #

To understand Optimism, we must first understand how Optimistic Rollups work, because this Layer 2 solution is completely based on this model. In short, Optimism is an EVM compatible optimistic rollup chain that aims to provide fast transactions and simplicity to Ethereum users while being secured by Ethereum’s Layer 1 security.

To make transactions fast and cheap, optimistic rollups do not use any computational power from the ETH network. Instead they assume that every transaction is valid and only need computation when they need to run a fraud-proof in the event of a challenge.

A challenge occurs when validators or someone else notice that there’s a chance of fraud in a certain transaction. In this situation a fraud-proof will be submitted, and the challenger will need to lock up a certain amount of ETH virtually signalling that they guarantee that they are telling the truth. If the transaction turns out to be valid, the locked ETH will be slashed and some of it will be spent to cover the costs of submitting the fraud-proof to the main chain.

Speed and simplicity are achieved by “rolling up” many transactions and submitting them in batches to the Mainnet. To use as little as possible computing power Optimism simply proposes a new state to the L1 instead of submitting the data to be processed entirely on the Mainnet.

It is worth noting that this is the current state of things and that Optimistic Rollups are prone to frequent changes in the future. New and more efficient ways to submit rolled up data to Layer 1 are discovered almost every day and transaction fees have been slashed at least 3 times in 2021 thanks to these innovations.

It is expected that transaction cost and speed will drastically be improved with the introduction of sharding chains. In the current state Optimism improves the ETH experience by 10-100x but with sharding this number will continue increasing.

Optimism’s Goal #

Scaling problems of Ethereum are more than evident. Transaction costs are unbearable for small investors and the network costs only get worse with the growing number of users.

Optimism is trying to constantly improve the concept of Optimistic Rollups and enable ETH users to have the same experience on Layer 2 with faster and cheaper transactions while keeping the same security that Layer 1 has.

Over time and with the introduction of sharing the benefits of Layer 2 Rollups will become more and more recognizable.

Conclusion #

High transaction fees are drastically slowing up the adoption of cryptocurrency worldwide as many Layer 1 chains are struggling to keep them low. Ethereum is certainly the most popular of them all but users are rarely inclined to pay 20 or 30 dollars just to submit a data entry on the blockchain.

With Optimism and Optimistic Rollups there is hope that this problem will get resolved by redirecting ETH users to these Layer 2 solutions where they can enjoy fast and cheap transactions at a fraction of L1 costs. They may need more time to become more efficient but even at this stage they are a big improvement to the Ethereum user experience.

References:
Ethereum. (n.d.). Ethereum Glossary. Ethereum.Org. Retrieved January 22, 2022, from Ethereum Glossary | ethereum.org

Ethereum Glossary. (n.d.). Ethereum.Org. Retrieved January 22, 2022, from Ethereum Glossary | ethereum.org

Updated on January 24, 2022
How do you feel about this article?
 

Leave a Reply

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package - please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.