*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Introduction To Yield Hunt

The expansion of GameFi projects is on the rise and Avalanche is joining the race with Yield Hunt, a game inspired by the Wolf Game on Ethereum. Yield Hunt aims to bring gamification to investors in an interesting new way that should benefit those with smaller and higher stakes equally, as much as that is possible, through NFT staking.

What Is Yield Hunt? #

Yield Hunt is a new GameFi title on Avalanche that wants to bring the concept of the popular ETH project Wolf Game to the Avax audience. Players hunt for $GEM through staking and stealing loot from others.

This is achieved by having two classes in the game, Hunters and Adventurers, both of which have their own unique properties.

The minting period has ended and the only way to acquire Hunters or Adventurers is by purchasing them on NFTtrade or other NFT markets on Avalanche.

Game Mechanics #

During the minting process only 10,000 Gen 0 NFTs could be minted using Avax. The remaining 40,000 were minted using the in-game currency which is $GEM. All mints had a 90% chance of giving you an Adventurer and a 10% chance of giving you a Hunter.

After acquiring an in-game character players can stake them to earn different rewards. The gamification model enabled players that staked their Hunters to steal minted Adventurers, but the rewards weren’t split among the whole pool. Only one Hunter would be lucky enough to grab a free Adventurer NFT and they have a 10% chance to do so on every new mint.

Staked Adventurers accumulate $GEM rewards that can be claimed at any time but not all accumulated rewards go to the Adventurer NFT owners. There is a 20% tax on claims which is then distributed among all staked Hunters.

Staked Hunters wait for Adventurers to accumulate $GEM rewards and get a share of the 20% tax. Unlike Adventurers, Hunters don’t have a tax on claiming funds and everything that is available for claiming will end up in their wallet.

To prevent constant selling of $GEM, Yield Hunt has a 0.01 AVAX claiming fee for every staked NFT. This means that claiming rewards from 10 staked NFTs will cost 0.1 AVAX on top of the transaction fees.

Unstaked Adventurers that didn’t claim their $GEM rewards will be at risk of losing all of their rewards. All Hunters have a 50% chance of stealing these funds if left unclaimed for 2 days or more.

Tokenomics #

$GEM is the only in-game currency with a very clear tokenomics model:

  • Maximum supply of $GEM is 5,000,000,000.
  • When the supply reaches 2,400,000,000 through staking rewards the reward program will end.
  • 600,000,000 $GEM tokens will be held by the team for further development, burns and potential airdrops.
  • $300k of GEM/AVAX deployed and locked on the TraderJoe DEX.
  • 1,800,000,000 $GEM tokens required to mint the remaining 40k NFTs (already minted).

Conclusion #

Yield Hunt is still a very new title on the scene so investors should be familiar with all of the risks involved before purchasing and staking their NFTs. The team behind the game recently completed KYC verification through Assure which should be a step in the right direction when it comes to trust between the creators and investors.

In terms of gameplay, do not expect too much just yet since the game only has NFT staking as a feature and everything else is settled on-chain based on chance and other factors written in the code.

Updated on February 9, 2022
How do you feel about this article?
 

Leave a Reply

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package - please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.