*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Common MasterChefs

Listed below are the commonly forked MasterChefs (Pancake, Goose, Viking, Autofarm, Fullsail, Jigg, Slime, Deflate, Runner, Blizzard and Panther). These can be used for educational purposes or for creating your own farm, but are most commonly used as reference material when checking new yield farms for potentially harmful modifications.

Pancake #

0x73feaa1ee314f8c655e354234017be2193c9e24e


Goose #

0xe70E9185F5ea7Ba3C5d63705784D8563017f2E57


Viking #

0xEf6e807fD2c0Ef5883A03Ed1b962333E8C9b725f


Autofarm #

0xa184088a740c695e156f91f5cc086a06bb78b827
0x0895196562c7868c5be92459fae7f877ed450452


Fullsail #

0x2d54f0293aa8b72b0b24d620d83d060cc3d20f9d


Jiggly #

https://github.com/jigglyfinance/jiggly-contracts/blob/master/contracts/MasterChef.sol


Slime #

0x4B0073A79f2b46Ff5a62fA1458AAc86Ed918C80C


Deflate #

0xff4735e3f45c2f004b48a9cbd708262b4399c0f1


Runner #

0x0915da9903D247DF65775DDd33712f8eE54eF8b3


Blizzard #

0x2078f4a75c92a6918d13e3e2f14183443ebf55d3


Panther #

0x058451c62b96c594ad984370eda8b6fd7197bbd4


Goose v2 #

https://github.com/goosedefi/goose-contracts/blob/master/contracts/MasterChefV2.sol

Updated on June 24, 2021
How do you feel about this article?
 

Leave a Reply

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package - please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.