*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Proof of Stake

Proof-of-Stake first appeared in 2012 when Sunny King and Scott Nadal published their paper on Peercoin. They described the consensus mechanism as “peer-to-peer cryptocurrency design derived from Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin”.

The Peercoin network was launched with a cross between a proof of work (PoW) and proof of stake (PoS) mechanism, with PoW mainly being used to store the initial stock. However, PoW was not required for the long-term sustainability of the network, and its importance was gradually reduced. In fact, most of the network security relied on PoS.

Before diving into what proof of stake is, it’s important to mention proof of work. The Bitcoin network uses a so-called Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism. The PoW is the mechanism by which the transactions are collected into blocks, and then linked together to create the blockchain. Miners compete among themselves to solve a complex mathematical calculation. The miner who has done this first gets the right to add the block to the blockchain and receives the reward for this (which means bitcoins in this case).

Proof of Work has proven over time to be a very robust mechanism to facilitate consensus in a decentralized way. The problem, however, is that it involves a lot of random calculations. The puzzle the miners are trying to solve only serves to keep the network safe. Indeed, it keeps the network safe but the energy could also be better distributed.

To solve this problem, there is proof of stake. The main idea is that the participants in the network can lock their coins (their “stake”). Someone can decide to participate in the Proof of Stake algorithm. He will first have to bet money for this, the stake. It is then determined what someone’s interest is within the network. The protocol randomly grants the right to one of the people (with a high interest) to validate the next block. Usually, the odds of being picked are proportional to the number of coins – the more coins staked, the higher the odds. For example, the participants who create new blocks are not chosen based on their computer power as how it is with PoW, but the participants are chosen based on the amount of coins they have in their possession.

The stake gives the right to validate blocks, but also ensures that nodes do their best to do a good job. If someone does not comply with the rules set by the network, it can be decided to take the bet and remove someone from the network. In this way, the network wants to ensure that they can trust whoever is validating blocks.

Proof of Stake entitles nodes with a share of network tokens to receive rewards for validating blocks. This consensus is in contrast to the Proof of Work algorithm used in Bitcoin, a lot more environmentally friendly. Proof of Work is all about who has the most computing power.

Updated on July 19, 2021
How do you feel about this article?
 

Leave a Reply

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package - please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.