OKXChain Farms

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Filter by risk
No data was found

🚨 Centralized application, user funds have to be deposited into a wallet which is controlled by the platform. Tokens can be withdrawn by the platform anytime. 🚨

Posted on 04 May 2023 |

The project implements an individual contract for each farm and pool. These contracts interact with the same vault. It is a multi-chain platform and 🚨 unfortunately a few contracts are found unverified on some of the chains [ex BSC, OKC]. In most implementations, the same code is implemented, but in some the blacklist functionality is added.

Although, taking into account the amount of resources that we should allocate to the review of each of the contracts of each of the chains, and considering that the review may not be valid for future pools added, we would initially rate the project as [not eligible] but considering the below, the rating will be [high risk].

  • 🚨 Receipt Tokens Ownership has not been renounced.
  • 🚨 Vault Ownership has not been renounced.
  • 🚨 Funds deposited in the vault can be withdrawn by the gov (or from any address that is given the whitdraw role) at any time directly and/or indirectly.
  • 🚨Vault contract can be paused.
  • 🚨 Users can be blacklisted and unable to make new deposits and withdraw previously made deposits.
  • ⚠️ Project uses its own router which seems to be a fork of Uniswap V2 (0.225% swap fee). Ensure that you perform a small test transaction first and check that the Router contract matches the one here:
Posted on 13 July 2022 |

RugDoc KYC: Project owner has KYC’d to us, and has signalled his transparency and commitment to this project and shall retain full responsibility over them and any actions taken by them.

  • ✅ KYC'd with RugDoc

We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours.

Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level of complexity. DYOR.

Posted on 25 December 2021 |

🚨🚨🚨 Contract is behind a proxy that can HARD RUG you at any time. DO NOT STAKE in this contract. If you have, REVOKE APPROVAL 🚨🚨🚨

The proxy implementation is an unverified contract and could contain anything!

Posted on 08 November 2021 |

Consolidation of different "miners" being deployed in different chains with different tokens where contracts are complete copies of each other.

PLEASE NOTE that these types of projects appear to be straight up ponzi schemes and you WILL lose money if you're not lucky enough to have more users come in after you so you can cash out. RugDoc HIGHLY recommends staying away from these types of projects. We are marking this as ineligible so it does not get requested again. DYOR.

This includes the following:

Posted on 29 September 2021 |

Lavacake Fork

  • Layer 2 of SpaceX
  • ⚠️ Masterchef currently not behind a timelock
  • ⚠️ Has individual strategy contracts tied up in its pools that deposits user's funds to delegated farms to earn additional income for the platform. We recommend it to undergo an audit to safeguard users from possible vulnerabilities that could arise from this implementation.
  • ✅ Max 4% deposit and withdraw fees
  • ✅ Correctly accounts for transfer taxes on any token pool
  • 5% referral (max 5%)
  • 1/10th of emission rewards minted to dev address
  • Withdrawal fee decreases to 0% depending on how long the user is staked in the platform
  • Fee address can be set to the zero address, which would block regular withdrawals, harvests, and emergency withdrawals
  • Code shows a max token supply of 5 Billion, however it doesn't seem to be implemented in the masterchef nor the token contract
  • 65% of tokens is supplied as liquidity, of which 88% is under a 67-day locker contract

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x34456C...5c2F1)

Posted on 15 September 2021 |

KSwap has been around since February 2021. It's an AMM like Uniswap, SushiSwap, etc., which offers four (4) types of yield farming i.e. Liquidity (the usual one where you stake your LP tokens to earn), Dual Mining (where you stake your LP tokens and earn the platform token and another partner token as rewards), Trading (where you can earn platform token rewards when trading the pairs that support trading mining), and Deposit (which is the usual single asset staking where you earn the native token as reward). As of time of writing, KSwap appears to be one of the prominent projects in OEC.

We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level of complexity. DYOR.

Posted on 05 September 2021 |

SPONSORED AD

🚨🚨🚨 Contracts are unverified and could contain code to steal all funds and take all approved funds too 🚨🚨🚨

Posted on 28 August 2021 |

Panther fork

  • ✅ Correctly accounts for transfer taxes on any token pool
  • ⚠️ Masterchef not behind a timelock
  • 2.5% transfer tax (max 5%)
  • Transfer tax tokens not used to create liquidity, its just sold to OKT and kept in the token contract
  • No deposit fee
  • No anti-whale
  • 1/10th of emission rewards minted to dev address

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x73...eaf9)

Posted on 17 August 2021 |

Goose fork.

  • ⚠️ No pools have been added to the Masterchef. There is a risk of the contract being switched out.
  • ⚠️ 100% deposit fees possible
  • ⚠️ Masterchef currently not behind a timelock
  • 1/10th of emission rewards minted to dev address
  • ⚠️ Anti-whale can be set artificially low, which could impede/block transfers.
  • ⚠️Masterchef has not been excluded from anti-whale which could block harvests.
  • 0.5% anti-whale (min 0.1%)
  • ⚠️ Does not support deflationary/transfer-tax token pools, just clarify with project that none will be added

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x06863eaad...1b17)

Posted on 10 August 2021 |

Goose fork. This is the OKEx expansion from the BoneSwap team.

  • ✅ Correctly accounts for transfer taxes on any token pool
  • ✅ Max 4% deposit fees
  • ⚠️ Masterchef currently not behind a timelock
  • 1/10th of emission rewards minted to dev address
  • 2.5% referral
  • Router and Factory look to be clean PCS V1 forks and is similar to their KCC AMM, which has been operating without issues for quite a while now.

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (Ends in 55CC)

Posted on 02 August 2021 |

🚨 Has MIGRATOR and can steal your funds at any time.

 

Posted on 01 August 2021 |

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.