Avalanche Farms

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Filter by risk
No data was found

HoudiniSwap is a project that claims to allow trading between multiple assets and multiple chains, using the Monero blockchain as an intermediary to provide a layer of anonymity. The functionality is similar to FixeFloat or similar services, in the sense that no smart contracts are used, instead the deposit by the user is made to a wallet controlled by the project, which then sends.

  • ⚠️ RugDoc HIGHLY recommends thinking through all possible scenarios in these types of projects thoroughly and assessing your risk tolerance. DYOR.
  • They have their own Token ($POOF: 0x888c...f57a), which is only found on the ETH chain:
    • ⚠️ Transfer can be blocked anytime by blacklisting
    • Initial liquidity locked until Feb 18, 2023 (see tx)
    • Max Supply: 100,000 tokens
    • PreMinted: 100%
    • Taxes: Buy 6% | Sell 6% | Transfer 2%
    • Other Significant Governance Privileges: owner can take out any token from the contract (unless it is the token itself), enable trading once, change all fee receiving addresses and change the ratio's at which these addresses receive fees.
Posted on 24 January 2023 |

RelyFund uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 5% of the deposits and withdrawals go to the dev address.

  • 🚨 The dev can withdraw any amount of the contract funds at any time without restriction
  • 🚨 The dev can blacklist any user, preventing them from claiming rewards.
  • ✅ 1% staking fees (Fixed).
  • ✅ 1% reward fees (Fixed).
  • 5% referral.

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here:

Posted on 03 January 2023 |

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

The project uses a different contract for each pool. All contracts are similar, so the current review is valid for all.

  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 30 days after poolEndTime
  • Deposit Fee: 1%
  • ✅ Max 1% Deposit Fee
  • ✅ No Transfer Tax on Native Token
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • Genesis is running for 2 days

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here

Posted on 04 December 2022 |

Similar methodology to other projects that have rugged. Probably the same guy of Peanut Fi and Halloween Tomb.

The website is not working and the liquidity is too low and it is unlocked. Even the rugger requested the review with the same telegram user account and only the name was changed.

Posted on 19 October 2022 |
Update

UPDATE: 🚨 Frontend is compromised and lets the users approve a different address which could also compromise your assets. 🚨

Updated on 26 October 2022

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ No liquidity yet, therefore the genesis rewards cannot be sold
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 90 days after poolEndTime
  • ⚠️ Fee address can be set to the zero address, which would block harvests
  • Deposit Fee: 1%
  • ✅ Max 1% Deposit Fee
  • ✅ TaxOffice Ownership renounced (TransferTax is set to 0%)
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • Genesis is running for 1 day

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x4fcA...22Be)

Posted on 18 October 2022 |

Rugged. Website down. Dev pulled out liquidity [tx1 | tx2] for the sum of ~3 $AVAX (~$49) and transferred them to a Binance account.

Posted on 18 October 2022 |
Update

The project has re-deployed its contracts:

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 Token Ownership not renounced. Owner can mint & dump.
  • ⚠️ Token Operator = Treasury, but Token Ownership not renounced.
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 90 days after poolEndTime
  • ✅ Max 5% Deposit Fee.
  • ✅ No Transfer Tax on Native Token
  • Genesis is running for 1 day

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xfD08D9...A31f)

Updated on 22 October 2022

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 Token Ownership not renounced. Owner can mint & dump.
  • 🚨 Token Operator is a wallet which can mint & dump
  • ⚠️ The site is not working and no pools have been added. There is a risk of the contract being switched out.
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ No liquidity yet, therefore the genesis rewards cannot be sold
  • ⚠️ Governance can drain the contract 90 days after poolEndTime
  • ✅ Max 5% Deposit Fee. ⚠️ No pool has been added yet, but when it is added you must put some fee for it. Zero fee pools will not accept deposits but will not fail either.
  • ✅ No Transfer Tax on Native Token
  • Genesis is running for 1 day

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x14f308...da79)

Posted on 18 October 2022 |

SPONSORED AD

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 Token Ownership not renounced. Owner can mint & dump.
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ✅ Function governanceRecoverUnsupported removed
  • ✅ No Deposit Fee
  • ✅ Transfer Tax is capped at 30%
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • Genesis is running for 3 days
  • Share Token Operator is the Treasury and the Treasury is an upgradeable proxy. ProxyAdmin owner is a 365-day TimelockController

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x36C0...829B)

Posted on 11 October 2022 |
Update

🚨 Liquidity Pulled and website down 🚨

Updated on 10 October 2022

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • ⚠️ No liquidity yet, therefore the genesis rewards cannot be sold
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • ✅ Max 1% Deposit Fee
  • ✅ No Transfer Tax on Native Token
  • ✅ Genesis Operator renounced
  • ✅ Function governanceRecoverUnsupported cannot be called because Genesis Operator has been renounced
  • Genesis is running for 1 day

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x7757...B51B)

Posted on 10 October 2022 |

Jarvis Network deals with overcollateralized stablecoins and synthetic fiat currencies in multiple chains. We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours.

Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level of complexity. DYOR.

Posted on 08 October 2022 |

Pancakeswap fork with additional custom functions

  • ⚠️ Masterchef owner can mint any amount of $AVEX for free to any address. Owner can mint and dump.
  • ⚠️ Masterchef owner can burn the deposit receipts of any user without prior approval. This leads to potential loss of unclaimed rewards as it blocks regular withdrawals (emergency withdrawals would still work). This only affects the Avex pool (native token).
  • ⚠️ Masterchef owner can transfer (or recover) the Token ownership through the Masterchef contract [see code].
  • ⚠️ Masterchef owner can transfer (or recover) the Syrup ownership through the Masterchef contract [see code].
  • ⚠️ Either of the above two points can result in the owner being able to mint and dump on you
  • ⚠️ Masterchef uses per-block emissions instead of per-time. This is an antipattern on the Avalanche network.
  • ⚠️ Masterchef currently not behind a timelock
  • ⚠️ Does not support deflationary/transfer-tax token pools, just clarify with project that none will be added
  • ⚠️ Project appears to be using its own router which seems to be a fork of PCS router (swap fee 0.2%). Ensure that you perform a small test transaction first and check that the Router contract matches the one (0xe3Cb1b...d9Cd)
  • ✅ No deposit fees
  • 10M of $AVEX has been preminted
    • 1.9M has been lock with PinkLock (tx1 | tx2 | tx3)
    • 4.5M has been used to presale (tx).
    • ⚠️ 250K has been sent to a fresh wallet (tx).
    • ⚠️ 3.35M still left in the dev wallet (txs)
  • Dev address can be set to the zero address, which would block regular withdrawals and harvests
  • An extra 10% of emission rewards are minted to the dev address.
  • Masterchef owner can modify the multiplier to any value, which can lead to an error in the emission.
  • Emergency withdraw function is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens.

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0xbf52db...47fa)

Posted on 05 October 2022 |

Wealth Mountain uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 10% of the deposits/rewards go to the dev address.

  • ⚠️ RugDoc HIGHLY recommends thinking through all possible scenarios in these types of projects thoroughly and assessing your risk tolerance. DYOR.
  • ⚠️ Max of 10% early withdrawal fee, min of 2%.
  • ✅ Max 10% staking fees.
  • 3% referral.
  • ⚠️ Withdrawals and harvests will fail once the BUSD/USDC supply has been depleted.
  • ⚠️ Pending rewards will continue accumulating once BUSD/USDC supply is depleted, but none could be harvested

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here:

Posted on 27 September 2022 |

It's a staking contract that uses a referral-based reward system where it depends on incoming users and fees to generate the rewards.

⚠️ RugDoc HIGHLY recommends thinking through all possible scenarios in these types of projects thoroughly and assessing your risk tolerance. DYOR.

  • ⚠️⚠️ 50K USDTM tokens have been pre-minted and remain in the dev wallet. These can be dumped at any time.⚠️⚠️
  • ⚠️ There is no unstake option so once you stake there is no withdrawing your initial deposit.
  • 5% fees
  • 2% referrals
  • 1.5% daily returns.
  • Developer is automatically added as a referral and earns referral rewards in case you didn't indicate any when depositing.

Dev wallet was funded through a bridge by this wallet (0xae6a0b...3b3fPolygon tx | Avax tx). This in turn, was funded through a bridge by this other wallet (0x31ce4a...9498 | Avax tx | Polygon tx). The latter (0x31ce4...) is the same one that is found as a treasury fund wallet in the $PAE token, the share token of Ripae Finance ($PAE contract).

PLEASE NOTE that the success in these types of projects rely on enough users entering a stake after yours or you will lose money as there will not be enough funds for everyone eligible for a payout to cash out.

Posted on 18 September 2022 |

Minimax is a multi-chain yield aggregator protocol. The project's approach is determining the platform with the highest returns and claims that users can rebalance their portfolio so that their funds are in the best yielding option. It also allows for users to set a stop-loss and take-profit on on their farming positions. Take note as well that the protocol's contracts are under a transparent upgradeable proxy which could literally update the implementation into any contract.

We reserve the right to not review complex projects that would require a great deal of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies. Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level. DYOR.

Posted on 06 September 2022 |

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨 Token Ownership not renounced. Owner can mint & dump
  • 🚨 Token Operator is a wallet which can mint & dump
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • ⚠️ No liquidity yet, therefore the genesis rewards cannot be sold
  • ✅ Function governanceRecoverUnsupported removed
  • ✅ No Deposit Fee
  • ✅ Transfer Tax is capped at 30%
  • Genesis is running for 2 days
  • Share Token Operator is the Treasury and the Treasury is an upgradeable proxy. ProxyAdmin owner is a 365-day TimelockController

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xF6aC...673e)

Posted on 03 September 2022 |

SmartGamble is a new betting protocol, with roulette being its first game released to the public. In addition to betting, the user can choose to be a provider and earn fees generated during failed bets from other players. The protocol is currently implemented in both BSC and Avalanche. Although in their documentation they present themselves as a decentralized protocol, the contracts are still in the possession of the deployer, assuming that it is in its early stage it can be taken as normal, but it is good to know that the parameters of the contracts can be modified without any announcement. The following can also be noted for this project:

  • 🚨 Owner can drain any token from House contract (0xee03e1...6b1d) 🚨
  • Max win fee: 1% (betting with native token) | 4%.
  • Max gamble fee: 1%
  • Max withdraw fee: 4%
  • Referrer: Max 25%.
  • ⚠️ Random contract is unverified (0x320824...8524).

SmartGamble Token ($GAMBLE, live since 5/9/2022)

  • Basic ERC20 token
  • Total Supply 10,000 $GAMBLE
  • 100% premined
  • No taxes
  • No max tx
  • No anti whale
  • 🚨 98% of Total Supply added to liquidity but all LP tokens held in EOA with zero locking/vesting. These tokens can be dumped on the market at any time!

We reserve the right to not review complex projects that would require a great deal of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies. Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level. DYOR.

Posted on 01 September 2022 |

Vacus Finance is a yield aggregator protocol running on Avalanche.

The project has an audit by Solidity Finance. ⚠️ Note that it covers only the native token [link].

Some points to consider:

  • Max supply: 300M
    • ⚠️ 195M $VCS preminted to an EOA [txs].
    • 75M $VCS pre-minted to 3 different contracts (teamLock, communityLock and marketingLock) of which none are verified.
    • 30M $VCS pre-minted for initial liquidity [tx]. LP tokens have been locked until 1 Oct, 2022 [0xb81d77...61dc].
  • Both the vault and each of its strategies are upgradeable proxies. ⚠️The strategies implementations are not verified.

We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours.

Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level of complexity. DYOR.

Posted on 17 August 2022 |

The project implements an individual contract for each farm and pool. These contracts interact with the same vault. It is a multi-chain platform and 🚨 unfortunately a few contracts are found unverified on some of the chains [ex BSC, OKC]. In most implementations, the same code is implemented, but in some the blacklist functionality is added.

Although, taking into account the amount of resources that we should allocate to the review of each of the contracts of each of the chains, and considering that the review may not be valid for future pools added, we would initially rate the project as [not eligible] but considering the below, the rating will be [high risk].

  • 🚨 Receipt Tokens Ownership has not been renounced.
  • 🚨 Vault Ownership has not been renounced.
  • 🚨 Funds deposited in the vault can be withdrawn by the gov (or from any address that is given the whitdraw role) at any time directly and/or indirectly.
  • 🚨Vault contract can be paused.
  • 🚨 Users can be blacklisted and unable to make new deposits and withdraw previously made deposits.
  • ⚠️ Project uses its own router which seems to be a fork of Uniswap V2 (0.225% swap fee). Ensure that you perform a small test transaction first and check that the Router contract matches the one here:
Posted on 13 July 2022 |

Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].

  • ⚠️ Not KYC'd with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ No reputable audits as of date
  • ⚠️ Liquidity is not locked with RugDoc
  • ⚠️ Not in a multisig. We highly recommend the project to use one with community members or reliable 3rd parties as an approver due to the said governance risk.

🚨  We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨

Genesis Contract Review

  • 🚨🚨🚨🚨Contains hard rug code🚨🚨🚨🚨
  • ⚠️ Does not account for transfer-tax tokens. Withdraw is prone to reentrancy attacks in case of vulnerable tokens
  • 🚨🚨🚨🚨 Governance can drain the contract after set was called🚨🚨🚨🚨
  • 🚨🚨🚨🚨Withdraw will drain the brando token out of the contract after set was called, all other tokens(AVAX etc) wont be withdrawable.🚨🚨🚨🚨
  • ✅ Token Ownership renounced
  • ✅ Token Operator = Treasury
  • ✅ Fixed 0.5% Genesis Pool Deposit Fee
  • ✅ TaxOffice Ownership renounced (TransferTax is set to 0%)
  • Genesis is running for 1 day

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xd680...065e)

Posted on 07 July 2022 |

Description

  • ApeInBet is on the road to be the world’s BIGGEST crypto-centric online casino with the goal of giving back the majority of its profits to our community. Equipped to disrupt an industry worth 100s of billions of dollars annually using web3 technology, we aim to be one of the biggest operators in the metaverse and web2 space. From our online casino, we will dedicate a total of 70% nett profits to be shared with NFT holders, which will be broken down as 50% as cash & 20% to be used for NFT buybacks. The remaining 30% will be used to cover payroll & team expansion, marketing & further development costs.

Max Mintable / Minted (%) [At time of listing]

  • Presale: 500 / 0 (0%)
  • Giveaway: 150 / 0 (0%)
  • Sale: 9350  / 0 (0%)

Mint Price

  • Presale: 50$
  • Sale: 100$ with an increment of 100$ per 1000 NFTs sold

Launch Details

  • Presale: July 6, 2022 @2 AM UTC
  • Sale: July 28, 2022 @2 AM UTC

Contract

  • Unknown (Mint is not live yet)

Community Hypestatus

Reward Features

  • Cash given back to investors
  • Staking reward earned from NFT Sale
Posted on 01 July 2022 |

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.