Filter by network
Filter by risk
*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.
ETH Beans uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 8% of the deposits/rewards go to the dev address. Please note that these types of projects appear to be straight up ponzi schemes and you will lose money if you're not lucky enough to have more users come in after you so you can cash out. RugDoc highly recommends staying away from these types of projects. DYOR.
🚨 Contract contains upgradeability features wherein the owner can switch out the contracts into anything. 🚨
Mummy Finance appears to be a multi-product platform that deals with NFTs, Staking, Vaults, and an exchange. Their main product is its DEX which handles low cost leveraged longs/shorts or a straight-swap of assets.
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies. Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level of complexity. DYOR.
Goose fork
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x3134f7...ECBa)
Goose fork
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x1f5fd1...1cC4)
Solidly/Velodrome and Curve hybrid with some changes to the fees and mechanism from originals.
The Thena project removes various mechanisms and modifies some other functionalities of the original projects, so it is recommended to read the docs to understand how the parts that make up the project work (see docs).
They still dont have an audit on their contract. They do have a preliminary version dated Oct 28, 2022. Its uploaded to the project repository and is not available on the page of the company responsible for carrying it out (Crypton Studio), perhaps due to its status as " preview version" (link 1 | link 2).
Having said the above, we are classifying this as Not Eligible as we recommend these kind of projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
Purple Beans uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 3% of the deposits/rewards go to the dev address. Please note that these types of projects appear to be straight up ponzi schemes and you will lose money if you're not lucky enough to have more users come in after you so you can cash out. RugDoc highly recommends staying away from these types of projects. DYOR.
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x1b9F...56C0)
Panther fork without referrals
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x9BA666...BDDD)
TSLAOracle uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 10% of the deposits/rewards go to the dev address.
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here: 0x8A6135...250A
BUSD Kingdom fork.
BUSD Galaxy uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 15% of the deposits go to the dev address.
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here: 0xca3408...a9ac
Fantasm Finance fork. Provides a Fractional-Algorithmic Synthetic Token pegged to the value of 1 FTM on Fantom. They have forked from the new contracts and not from the ones exploited a while ago.
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours.
Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.
Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level of complexity. DYOR.
Beyond what is mentioned above, we can indicate below some points that may be of interest to you regarding farms (0x664634...1771).
RugDoc KYC: Project owner has KYC’d to us, and has signalled his transparency and commitment to this project. We have also confirmed that the project owner has access to the privileged addresses of the project, and shall retain full responsibility over them and any actions taken by them.
Custom staking contract that accepts BUSD and rewards users BUSD over time.
⚠️ Having said the above points, we still highly advise users to DYOR when interacting with projects and know the inherent risks associated with such.
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x147b...d9b6)
Pocket Change uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 6% of the deposits/rewards go to the dev address.
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here: 0x193dcE...f6bB
Money Monster is a Wealth Mountain fork which uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 10% of the deposits/rewards go to the dev address.
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here: 0xF28605...2b9d
Galaxy Finance uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 10% of the deposits go to the dev address. 35% of the deposits go to the Galaxy Trading contract.
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here: 0x415b96...8638
Camelot is a complex multi-product project in Arbitrum that utilizes a master contract, CamelotMaster, which delegates user funds to different pools to earn both GRAIL and xGRAIL reward tokens. Currently, there are over 21 pools deployed under the master contract. Paladin audit seems to have covered most of the potential hard-rug risks or funds being stuck.
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours.
Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.
Since our resources are stretched thin and we don’t have the funding for these kind of massive endeavors, we may pass on projects that meet this level of complexity. DYOR.
Stake BUSD uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 3% of the deposits and 4% of the withdrawals go to the dev address.
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here: 0x6FA82b...62Cf
UPDATE:
Panther fork without referrals
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x8F4Ed4...b66e)
UPDATE 3:
UPDATE 2:
UPDATE 1:
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0xab4d93...cc8d)
Lucky Cat V2 uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 5% of the deposits and withdrawals go to the dev address.
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here: 0x6D4b08...080E
RelyFund uses a referral-based reward or a penalty system where it depends on incoming/outgoing users and 5% of the deposits and withdrawals go to the dev address.
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here:
Disclaimer: This is done with our best knowledge and effort, nothing can be known for certain – always DYOR and risk management. This is NOT financial advice. Use the information presented here to inform your own decisions. Referral links may be included on any outbound link.
🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:
1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.
2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.
3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.
Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.
This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.
A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.
Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.
Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.
Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.
🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.
🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.
⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.
🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.
🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!
⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.