*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Search Results for: seed – Page 2

Update

Update:

  • The project has locked the following liquidity with RugDoc:
Updated on 10 December 2021

Goose fork

  • ✅ Max 4% deposit fees
  • ✅ Masterchef behind a 6 hour timelock
  • ✅ All transfer-tax tokens are supported
  • 10% of emissions sent to dev address

⚠️ Triple check the contract you interact matches the one reviewed here (0x9809...4b21)

Posted on 01 December 2021 |
Update
  • UPDATE: Users reported that the website is buggy and it seems like theres no overall price action lately
Updated on 11 February 2022

WeedOhm Finance is a fork of OlympusDAO and is launched on the Avalanche Chain. The platform follows a very complex system which involves multiple interconnected smart contracts that aim to build its reserve thru its platform profits to give its native token an intrinsic value that can support its unique approach on being an algorithmic reserve currency backed by decentralized assets.

WeedOhm Finance offers two options for users on its platform: Staking -- the platform allows you to deposit the native token where it gives out a token receipt that recalculates on every certain period (rebase) for your percentage share of Weed tokens in the pool which were collected from the platform fees and reward rates; and Bonding -- lend your LP tokens to the platform to gain discounted native tokens that is vested over a certain period. This method allows the platform to gain revenue from LP rewards to further reinforce its reserves and ensure exit liquidity.

Having said the above, we are classifying this as Not Eligible as we recommend these kind of projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.

Posted on 29 November 2021 |

SPONSORED AD

Goose fork with a lot of custom code. Has this weird pool.withdrawFee100 boolean that when set to true on a pool, the next deposit will send your whole balance in that pool to the feeAddress. We don't see the point of this. Custom AMM (router: 0x0F4610aB02920a99f639F675085A5d3e24b0D7ae) that seems a perfect PCS v2 clone. Be careful.

Posted on 13 June 2021 |

Goose fork

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x0ed3cF...5B29)

Posted on 23 February 2022 |

Didnt see any obvious rug functions. Seems fine.

Posted on 22 March 2021 |
Update

Please refer to this https://rugdoc.io/project/zombie-farm-graves/

Updated on 21 July 2021

There are three chefs made by the contract creator all identical. Layer of Zombie. Clone of Zombie which is a fork of Jigg. Code seems fine. No overt rugs seen.

Posted on 12 May 2021 |
Update

Update: LPs were drained from an exploit

Updated on 4 July 2021

Dont see any overtly malicious code but this project involves 12 contracts one of which is currently not BSC verified and relates to migrations. Much of this code is custom. Team does not seem malicious and did a good job with returns bonuses and incentives to make up for the V1 exploit here but that said it was exploited once which means its a target.

Moneypot contract involves bonus paying transferring and depositing which appears to be able to be called by owner. Factory contract has many mints swaps burns and skim functions which appear locked and internal but make me uneasy. This project needs a thorough audit and probably more beta testing than it had to find bugs as it launched with several bugs which isnt surprising given how complicated and large this contract is. It involves lots of integration and would be really easy to bollocks some math or a call between contracts.

Native pools would be most at risk here vs non natives due to the nature of their incentive structure. Didnt find any of the typical rugs/exploits but this really needs a top tier audit for both safety and function. Team is getting a Gemz audit. Devs have been open and transparent from V1 to V2 in answering questions and being proactive.

Posted on 16 April 2021 |

 Jigg fork. Seems fine. 100% deposit fee possible so check timelock and interactions. No overt rugs seen 

Posted on 01 June 2021 |

Goose fork. Seems fine. Only changes are sends some of the token to the burn address and has some extra burn related transfers

Posted on 30 March 2021 |

Troop Token contracts are currently unavailable. The protocol is currently holding a private sale where users will need to send their crypto at 0xe940...7e40. We highly advise to proceed with CAUTION on this type of projects as there is no guarantee on whether users will be able to receive the promised token supply. DYOR.

Posted on 01 May 2023 |

AMM with its own factory, router, and LP contracts. All seemed to be straightforward forks. Some custom code. No overt rugs seen. Project part of MonetaryUnit ecosystem

FactoryRouter | Pairs

Posted on 25 May 2021 |

Team from BSC moving to Polygon. Has some differences in that it uses uniswap factory and thus has differences in LP pairing, swapping, deposit fee structure, and has an autobuyback function to keep price more stable just like they did in BSC. no overt rugs seen. Needs more GIFs

Posted on 12 May 2021 |

Deflate fork with some custom code in it related to burns, reflectance, and rewards. Didnt see any overt rug functions but code is complex and could be prone to bugs and exploits. Needs a good professional audit. Deflate does have Certik

Posted on 20 April 2021 |

large custom code for an NFT related farm. It mints, migrates, transfers these NFTs. Doesnt seem like a rug but looks like it could bug/rug/exploit given the large custom code. Watch and see what happens

Posted on 29 April 2021 |

Goose fork. Deposit fees up to 100%. Good amount of custom code that seems to deal with burn/emission type stuff. Didnt see any. overt rugs but with the custom code always good to be cautious. since its goose deposit fees can go to 100% outside of timelock

Posted on 09 April 2021 |

StealthEX is a crypto exchange aggregator (similar to 1Inch) that searches for an optimal exchange route with the best rates for users. However, the exchange process appears to be similar to Binance's Deposit Funds function where users need to send their cryptocurrencies to a specific address and the platform awaits confirmation of deposit before it makes a swap on your behalf. There appears to be no contract interaction and this method of swapping is considered to be quite risky. We strongly advise against sending your cryptocurrencies blindly without any DYOR on the platform.

Posted on 09 April 2023 |

its a vault. auto fork. Like all vaults it has inherent risk. it has incasetokensgetstuck. it has novel withdraw functions and transfer. It needs a pro audit and beta testing. Ideally I want a vault to just be tested against time. Also has a farm in which I didnt see any overt rugs.

Posted on 12 May 2021 |
Update

UPDATE: Updated contract from 0xb561cd380bd93be5dd210307c8532e7543b1ea9c to 0x1c1d4d8d087c7ee4a3936c04c0052032668cc0d4. Still has mismatch between the transfer tax in the token (div by 1000) and in the MC (div by 10000), and doesn't account for dev or burn amounts

Updated on 5 July 2021

UPDATE: are deploying a new contract. Wait to see what it is. Panther fork. Some differences in code/custom features. max transfer tax rate comment says 10% but code says 1%. Can update dev address and dev rate, transfer a cut of each payout to dev, dev is excluded from antiwhale feature. No overt rugs seen.

Posted on 12 May 2021 |

Pancake fork with LOTS of novel code relating mostly to their gaming features which are built into the chef in part but also in the mints, burns, and transfers of the token. Has fees allocated to dev, deges, coinflip, and roulette wallets. Calls a hook, references beforetokentransfer, and its in erc not bep (not really important just unusual). Has a withdrawal helper function. No overt rugs seen, but its a weird looking code for sure. Is a farm, vault, casino, and sports betting platform. Vaults are inherently risky. Needs an audit and bug testing.

Posted on 09 May 2021 |

BEP20 reflections token similar to Safemoon but fees are hard-coded to zero. According to their docs the token is to be used in a fitness application where it accrues fees but there is no way to set fees in the token contract (i.e. on-chain). Token has a lot of unused code which seems to indicate poor design standards

  • ✅ 14.7% of Total Supply will be send to liquidity and locked for ~3 years in PinkLock after presale
  • Max Supply: 10,000,000 FITD
  • PreMinted: 100%
  • Payout Method: None
  • Auto-Liquidity: 0%
  • Governance Privileges: owner can include/exclude accounts from rewards, which is useless because there are no rewards
  • ⚠️ Token seems to be blatantly forked without much knowledge of the code base. Any future token utilities will have to be built in the Fit Doge app (off-chain) for that to make sense

⚠️ Triple check the contract you interact matches the one reviewed here (0xEB9...971)

Posted on 27 May 2022 |

Search

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.