*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.
Search Results for: seed – Page 2
Update:
- The project has locked the following liquidity with RugDoc:
- 269.58 SHED-MATIC LP tokens (~83%) - Txn Hash: 0xad1...d1f56
- 0.0003535 SHED-USDC LP tokens (~80.7%) - Txn Hash: 0xf1f...1222b
Goose fork
- ✅ Max 4% deposit fees
- ✅ Masterchef behind a 6 hour timelock
- ✅ All transfer-tax tokens are supported
- 10% of emissions sent to dev address
⚠️ Triple check the contract you interact matches the one reviewed here (0x9809...4b21)
- UPDATE: Users reported that the website is buggy and it seems like theres no overall price action lately
WeedOhm Finance is a fork of OlympusDAO and is launched on the Avalanche Chain. The platform follows a very complex system which involves multiple interconnected smart contracts that aim to build its reserve thru its platform profits to give its native token an intrinsic value that can support its unique approach on being an algorithmic reserve currency backed by decentralized assets.
WeedOhm Finance offers two options for users on its platform: Staking -- the platform allows you to deposit the native token where it gives out a token receipt that recalculates on every certain period (rebase) for your percentage share of Weed tokens in the pool which were collected from the platform fees and reward rates; and Bonding -- lend your LP tokens to the platform to gain discounted native tokens that is vested over a certain period. This method allows the platform to gain revenue from LP rewards to further reinforce its reserves and ensure exit liquidity.
Having said the above, we are classifying this as Not Eligible as we recommend these kind of projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks.
SPONSORED AD
Goose fork with a lot of custom code. Has this weird pool.withdrawFee100 boolean that when set to true on a pool, the next deposit will send your whole balance in that pool to the feeAddress. We don't see the point of this. Custom AMM (router: 0x0F4610aB02920a99f639F675085A5d3e24b0D7ae) that seems a perfect PCS v2 clone. Be careful.
Goose fork
- 🚨 Seems to initial liquidity has been pulled already [see txs] and withdrawn across a bridge to BSC [see txs | see BSC txs] later to Polygon [see txs] and last send to this wallet.
- ✅ Max 2% deposit fees.
- ⚠️ 100% deposit fees possible.
- ⚠️ Masterchef currently not behind a timelock.
- ⚠️ Does not support deflationary/transfer-tax token pools, just clarify with project that none will be added.
- Dev address can be set to the zero address, which would block regular withdrawals and harvests.
- An extra 10% of emission rewards are minted to the dev address.
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0x0ed3cF...5B29)
Please refer to this https://rugdoc.io/project/zombie-farm-graves/
There are three chefs made by the contract creator all identical. Layer of Zombie. Clone of Zombie which is a fork of Jigg. Code seems fine. No overt rugs seen.
Update: LPs were drained from an exploit
Dont see any overtly malicious code but this project involves 12 contracts one of which is currently not BSC verified and relates to migrations. Much of this code is custom. Team does not seem malicious and did a good job with returns bonuses and incentives to make up for the V1 exploit here but that said it was exploited once which means its a target.
Moneypot contract involves bonus paying transferring and depositing which appears to be able to be called by owner. Factory contract has many mints swaps burns and skim functions which appear locked and internal but make me uneasy. This project needs a thorough audit and probably more beta testing than it had to find bugs as it launched with several bugs which isnt surprising given how complicated and large this contract is. It involves lots of integration and would be really easy to bollocks some math or a call between contracts.
Native pools would be most at risk here vs non natives due to the nature of their incentive structure. Didnt find any of the typical rugs/exploits but this really needs a top tier audit for both safety and function. Team is getting a Gemz audit. Devs have been open and transparent from V1 to V2 in answering questions and being proactive.
Jigg fork. Seems fine. 100% deposit fee possible so check timelock and interactions. No overt rugs seen
Goose fork. Seems fine. Only changes are sends some of the token to the burn address and has some extra burn related transfers
Troop Token contracts are currently unavailable. The protocol is currently holding a private sale where users will need to send their crypto at 0xe940...7e40. We highly advise to proceed with CAUTION on this type of projects as there is no guarantee on whether users will be able to receive the promised token supply. DYOR.
Team from BSC moving to Polygon. Has some differences in that it uses uniswap factory and thus has differences in LP pairing, swapping, deposit fee structure, and has an autobuyback function to keep price more stable just like they did in BSC. no overt rugs seen. Needs more GIFs
Deflate fork with some custom code in it related to burns, reflectance, and rewards. Didnt see any overt rug functions but code is complex and could be prone to bugs and exploits. Needs a good professional audit. Deflate does have Certik
large custom code for an NFT related farm. It mints, migrates, transfers these NFTs. Doesnt seem like a rug but looks like it could bug/rug/exploit given the large custom code. Watch and see what happens
Goose fork. Deposit fees up to 100%. Good amount of custom code that seems to deal with burn/emission type stuff. Didnt see any. overt rugs but with the custom code always good to be cautious. since its goose deposit fees can go to 100% outside of timelock
StealthEX is a crypto exchange aggregator (similar to 1Inch) that searches for an optimal exchange route with the best rates for users. However, the exchange process appears to be similar to Binance's Deposit Funds function where users need to send their cryptocurrencies to a specific address and the platform awaits confirmation of deposit before it makes a swap on your behalf. There appears to be no contract interaction and this method of swapping is considered to be quite risky. We strongly advise against sending your cryptocurrencies blindly without any DYOR on the platform.
its a vault. auto fork. Like all vaults it has inherent risk. it has incasetokensgetstuck. it has novel withdraw functions and transfer. It needs a pro audit and beta testing. Ideally I want a vault to just be tested against time. Also has a farm in which I didnt see any overt rugs.
UPDATE: Updated contract from 0xb561cd380bd93be5dd210307c8532e7543b1ea9c to 0x1c1d4d8d087c7ee4a3936c04c0052032668cc0d4. Still has mismatch between the transfer tax in the token (div by 1000) and in the MC (div by 10000), and doesn't account for dev or burn amounts
UPDATE: are deploying a new contract. Wait to see what it is. Panther fork. Some differences in code/custom features. max transfer tax rate comment says 10% but code says 1%. Can update dev address and dev rate, transfer a cut of each payout to dev, dev is excluded from antiwhale feature. No overt rugs seen.
Pancake fork with LOTS of novel code relating mostly to their gaming features which are built into the chef in part but also in the mints, burns, and transfers of the token. Has fees allocated to dev, deges, coinflip, and roulette wallets. Calls a hook, references beforetokentransfer, and its in erc not bep (not really important just unusual). Has a withdrawal helper function. No overt rugs seen, but its a weird looking code for sure. Is a farm, vault, casino, and sports betting platform. Vaults are inherently risky. Needs an audit and bug testing.
BEP20 reflections token similar to Safemoon but fees are hard-coded to zero. According to their docs the token is to be used in a fitness application where it accrues fees but there is no way to set fees in the token contract (i.e. on-chain). Token has a lot of unused code which seems to indicate poor design standards
- ✅ 14.7% of Total Supply will be send to liquidity and locked for ~3 years in PinkLock after presale
- Max Supply: 10,000,000 FITD
- PreMinted: 100%
- Payout Method: None
- Auto-Liquidity: 0%
- Governance Privileges: owner can include/exclude accounts from rewards, which is useless because there are no rewards
- ⚠️ Token seems to be blatantly forked without much knowledge of the code base. Any future token utilities will have to be built in the Fit Doge app (off-chain) for that to make sense
⚠️ Triple check the contract you interact matches the one reviewed here (0xEB9...971)
Popular Links
For Farm Owners
Disclaimer: This is done with our best knowledge and effort, nothing can be known for certain – always DYOR and risk management. This is NOT financial advice. Use the information presented here to inform your own decisions. Referral links may be included on any outbound link.