WIKI
Donate

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

GreenTeaSwap V2

BSC
Polygon

RugDoc Review

Some Risk

Panther fork identical to BrizzyDefi.

  • ⚠️ GTEA-BUSD and GTEA-BNB (Polygon: GTEA-USDC and GTEA-MATIC) pools are displayed on site, but are not on the masterchef
  • ⚠️ Liquidity has not been added yet, there is the risk of the dev dumping. Please clarify with the project on liquidity management.
  • ⚠️ Masterchef currently not behind a timelock
  • ⚠️ Start block can be changed at any time, even if farming has already started, which could impact reward emissions.
  • ⚠️ Transfer-tax liquidity tokens can be sent to the operator wallet. Please clarify with the project on how they plan to use this.
  • ⚠️ Token router can be changed. Please check to ensure they are using the PancakeSwap router if set.
  • ⚠️ Anti-whale can be set artificially low, which could impede/block transfers.
  • ⚠️ Does not support deflationary/transfer-tax token pools aside from the native token, just clarify with project that none will be added
  • ✅ Max 4% deposit fees
  • 5% transfer tax (max 10%)
  • 0.5% anti-whale (min 0.01%)
  • 5-10 hr harvest lockups (max 14 days)
  • 1/10th of emission rewards minted to dev address
  • 1% referral

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact matches the one reviewed here. BSC (0x76993B9a…7816), Polygon (0x6Ef5b8ac…467c)

Updated on 2 September 2021
Website
View Contract

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Links

Website

Related Events

GreenTeaSwap V2
5 September 2021, 10:48 AM (UTC)
Block Countdown
Back to full list

Official Partners

BNBchain856
bubblemapsrdbig
Popular Links
Resources
For Farm Owners
Telegram Youtube Twitter Discord

Disclaimer: This is done with our best knowledge and effort, nothing can be known for certain – always DYOR and risk management. This is NOT financial advice. Use the information presented here to inform your own decisions. Referral links may be included on any outbound link.

  • What do the risk ratings mean?

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.

Search

  • How can I request for an update to my review?

🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.