*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

LandSwap Finance


RugDoc Review

Medium Risk


  • ✅ Masterchef is now behind a 6-hour timelock

PancakeSwap fork with Goose fork tokens

  • ⚠️ Has individual strategy contracts tied up in its pools that deposits user’s funds to delegated farms to earn additional income for the platform, and acts as a vault if there are no delegate farms assigned. We recommend it to undergo an audit to safeguard users from possible vulnerabilities that may arise from this implementation.
  • ⚠️ Syrup bug not resolved, just clarify with project that the syrup token, SLAND will not be used.
  • ⚠️ Masterchef is capable of 100% deposit fees
  • ⚠️ Masterchef currently not behind a timelock
  • ⚠️ Masterchef does not support deflationary/transfer-tax token pools, just clarify with project that none will be added
  • ⚠️ Token owner is NOT Masterchef. There is a risk of the dev minting and dumping. Please clarify with the project on token ownership.
  • If NFTs (ERC-721) are enabled on the platform, transfer of Land will burn tokens and each NFT consists of burn rates depending on what users possess.
  • Owner can modify start block but it will have no effect, just clarify with project that they will not try this
  • Dev address/fee address can be set to the zero address, which would block regular withdrawals and harvests
  • 1/10th of emission rewards minted to dev address
  • Token transfers checks if the farm has launched. It will fail if it hasn’t.
  • 200 LAND tokens in LAND-USDC LP wherein 100% of liquidity is with dev address

⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with matches the one reviewed here (0xb6196…6d2c8)

Updated on 10 October 2021

*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.

Project Type



Related Events

LandSwap Finance Token Launch
9 October 2021, 03:00 PM (UTC)
LandSwap Finance Farm Launch
10 October 2021, 03:00 PM (UTC)

Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.

This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.

A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.

Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.

Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.

Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.

🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.

🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.

⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.

🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.

🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!

⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.


🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:

1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.

2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.

3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.