Filter by network
Filter by risk
*Paid Advertisement. Not financial advice. RugDoc is not responsible for the projects showcased here. DYOR and ape safu.
Similar methodology to other projects that have rugged. Probably the same guy of Peanut Fi and Halloween Tomb.
The website is not working and the liquidity is too low and it is unlocked. Even the rugger requested the review with the same telegram user account and only the name was changed.
UPDATE: 🚨 Frontend is compromised and lets the users approve a different address which could also compromise your assets. 🚨
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
🚨 We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨
Genesis Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x4fcA...22Be)
The project has re-deployed its contracts:
Genesis Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xfD08D9...A31f)
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
🚨 We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨
Genesis Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x14f308...da79)
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
🚨 We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨
Genesis Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x36C0...829B)
🚨 Liquidity Pulled and website down 🚨
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
🚨 We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨
Genesis Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x7757...B51B)
Rugged. Website down. They drained the Bonus contract (0x3d99ae...3de2) after only 3 hours of implementing and launching it [tx1 | tx2]. The stolen funds (~$24.7k) have been transferred to a wallet that appears to belong to an exchange [txs | txs2 | 0xf89d7b...aa40]
⚠️ Bonus contract was not part of the first review. Always remember to verify that the contract is clean before investing.
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
🚨 We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨
Genesis Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xf1cE...fd7d5)
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
🚨 We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨
Genesis Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xBB60Fe...1b7C)
Rugged. Website down. Dev drained the Genesis contract throught a custom code
Rugger bridged the funds to Ethereum and finally withdrawn to Kucoin [tx1 | tx2 | tx3]
Update:
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
🚨 We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨
Genesis Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x07B6...093E)
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
🚨 We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨
Genesis Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x230486...0E8D)
🚨🚨🚨 Contract UNVERIFIED. It could contain ANYTHING. It is recommended that you exercise EXTREME CAUTION if you wish to interact with this project. To be safe, you should withdraw your funds immediately, and ask for their contracts to be verified. 🚨🚨🚨
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
🚨 We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨
Genesis Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xF6aC...673e)
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
Peg token Contract Review ($LION)
Presale Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x3CC9E6...4716 | 0x9bdb78...0804)
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
🚨 We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨
Genesis Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xb018...bC1E)
UPDATE:
Project has re-deployed some of its contracts, which also had rough code (infinite allocation via Treasury, drain boardroom, etc), which tells us that the addition of these pieces of code was not just a bad fork (as the dev of the project told us) but something intentional.
🚨 Likewise, the Genesis contract (0xa7106F...Bb80) still contains rug code, but of a different kind (the dev can drain the rewards from the Genesis contract and dump it on you) 🚨
🚨🚨🚨 Contains HARD RUG code that can steal staked tokens at any time 🚨🚨🚨
The dev can use the emergency withdrawal to drain the funds. Even with the contract renounced (0x9e0d6e...818b).
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
🚨 We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨
Genesis Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0xc15191...c2f3)
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
🚨 We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the reward pools of the project. 🚨
Reward Pools Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x42b6...db8c)
Algostable project which appears to be based on Tomb Finance project. We recommend these kind of complex projects to pass reputable audits and KYC verifications as there is a risk of governance mishandling. Before investing, we also recommend users to conduct their own due diligence checks. The codebases tend to be large and complex with various risk vectors. We are classifying the whole Project as [Not Eligible].
🚨 We want to be VERY clear that this review and it's rating ONLY applies to the genesis staking contract and not the actual operations of anything that happens anytime after genesis pools 🚨
Genesis Contract Review
⚠️ TRIPLE CHECK the contract you interact with. Make sure it matches the one reviewed here (0x8206...e23B)
UPDATE 2:
Allegedly, the dev intentionally drained to return funds to users who had deposited. In any case, it is curious to see that the dev has decided to drain the contract in the way that we have warned that the project could steal funds and not simply let the users themselves withdraw their funds. Anyways 🚨🚨🚨 Do not interact with the new contract 🚨🚨🚨
UPDATE:
Project has re-deployed its contracts with a supposed fix to the issue mentioned in the first review. It is insufficient, the start function still allows the dev to drain the contract at any time. This possibility exists even after the function has been called with the correct parameters the first time. 🚨🚨🚨 Do not interact with this contract either [0x54cbB0...4De8] 🚨🚨🚨
⚠️ FYI, the dev has drained ~317 OP token from the first reviewed contract [tx1 | tx2 | tx3].
🚨🚨🚨 Contains hard rug code that allows the dev to drain the contract funds before setting the start time. Even the function intended for such work could allow the dev to drain the funds from the contract in a different way. Do not interact with this contract [0x29b0e3...5a96]🚨🚨🚨
Disclaimer: This is done with our best knowledge and effort, nothing can be known for certain – always DYOR and risk management. This is NOT financial advice. Use the information presented here to inform your own decisions. Referral links may be included on any outbound link.
🟢 For owners who have made impactful changes and would like an update to their farm review:
1️⃣ Use #update at @RugDocChat with your description and proof of changes and it will be forwarded to our scanners.
2️⃣ This does not guarantee a change in your review.
3️⃣ Owners who have difficulty solving the issues can consider our Consultation Package – please contact @BaymaxCrypto on Telegram to discuss.
Our mission here at RugDoc is to screen for hard rug code that results in 100% theft of ALL underlying funds for ALL participants.
This is the ONE part of the due diligence process that most people cannot simply do on their own as it costs thousands of dollars to hire a senior solidity developer to look over a farm for safety.
A project coin with terrible code can go up in price, and a project with good code and a good team can also go down in price.
Do NOT use our ratings to refer to your likelihood in making money if you invest in the project. They are ONLY in reference to code safety.
Everything else beyond code safety is YOUR responsibility to go do research on. We just make sure the casino you’re betting in won’t rob you before you even get to place a bet.
Our reviews for projects are organized into a few colors.
🟢 Least Risk
These projects are the least likely to hard or soft rug. Usually reserved for cornerstone projects of an ecosystem where it makes no financial sense for them to rug in any manner as they make more money just being legit.
🔵 Low Risk
These projects are usually established projects in an ecosystem that have a track record of success or have KYC’d to us or other authoritative sources in the real world. As a result, it is extremely unlikely for them to soft rug or hard rug their projects. The projects can still fail and the token price can go down, but usually more as a result of natural market forces.
⚪️ Some Risk
This is the default rating for projects with unknown teams but have code that is unlikely to have hard rug risk. Since the team is unknown and doesn’t have a track record of success, it’s entirely possible that they may try to soft rug by dumping tokens, abandoning the project, etc. Even a last minute contract swap to a malicious contract is possible. The only thing that is unlikely is a complete hard rug as long as you are 100% sure you deposit into the contract we review.
🟠 Medium Risk
Similar to Some Risk, but the underlying code itself is custom enough or complex enough that it warrants an elevated risk rating that needs deeper research. Make sure you read every point presented to make sure you’re comfortable with that before entering. Still unlikely to hard rug, but more chances of custom code behaving incorrectly and causing other issues.
🔴 High Risk
Project contains code or practices that are HIGHLY LIKELY to lead to catastrophic losses as they are right now. Make sure you read the description carefully as we will always warn what these issues are. If you see the words Hard Rug anywhere in the review, STAY FAR AWAY!
⚫️ Not Eligible
We reserve the right to not review exceedingly complex projects that would require tens of thousands of dollars of senior security analyst man hours. Typically these are projects that deal with leverage, lending, options, derivatives, and anything that is overly complex and which requires tons of peer reviews and audits from top audit companies.